Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Association Between Thrombolytic Treatment and the Prognosis of Hemodynamically Stable Patients With Major Pulmonary Embolism: Results of a Multicenter Registry

Konstantinides, Stavros, Geibel, Annette, Olschewski, Manfred, Heinrich, Fritz, Grosser, Klaus, Rauber, Klaus, Iversen, Stein, Redecker, Matthias, Kienast, Joachim, Just, Hanjörg, Kasper, Wolfgang·1997·Circulation

Abstract

Background Thrombolytic treatment has been shown to accelerate resolution of major pulmonary embolism and lead to a rapid improvement of right-side hemodynamics. However, the association between these favorable effects and the clinical outcome of patients who have no severe hemodynamic compromise at presentation remains unknown. Methods and Results The present multicenter registry included 719 consecutive patients with major pulmonary embolism according to clinical, echocardiographic, scintigraphic, and cardiac catheterization criteria. Symptom onset was acute (<48 hours) in 63% of patients. All patients were hemodynamically stable (ie, without evidence of cardiogenic shock) at presentation. Primary thrombolytic treatment (within 24 hours of diagnosis) was given to 169 patients (23.5%), whereas the remaining 550 patients were initially treated with heparin alone. Overall 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the patients who received thrombolytic agents (4.7 versus 11.1%, P =.016). Clinical factors associated with a higher death rate were syncope ( P =.012), arterial hypotension ( P =.021), history of congestive heart failure ( P =.013), and chronic pulmonary disease ( P =.032). However, only primary thrombolysis was found by multivariate analysis to be an independent predictor of survival (odds ratio for in-hospital death, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.21 to 1.00). Patients who underwent early thrombolytic treatment had a reduced rate of recurrent pulmonary embolism (7.7 versus 18.7%, P <.001) but also a higher frequency of major bleeding episodes (21.9% versus 7.8%, P <.001). Cerebral bleeding occurred in 2 patients in each treatment group, and 1 patient in each group died of a bleeding complication. Conclusions The results of our study suggest that thrombolysis may favorably affect the clinical outcome of hemodynamically stable patients with major pulmonary embolism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.96.3.882

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Konstantinides, S., Geibel, A., Olschewski, M., Heinrich, F., Grosser, K., Rauber, K., Iversen, S., Redecker, M., Kienast, J., Just, H., & Kasper, W.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1997-08-05
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
882-888
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2975834859
Cited by
462
References
0
FWCI
14.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Between Thrombolytic Treatment and the Prognosis of Hemodynamically Stable Patients With Major Pulmonary Embolism: Results of a Multicenter Registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.96.3.882
The paper
Konstantinides, S., Geibel, A., Olschewski, M., Heinrich, F., Grosser, K., Rauber, K., Iversen, S., Redecker, M., Kienast, J., Just, H., & Kasper, W. (1997). Association Between Thrombolytic Treatment and the Prognosis of Hemodynamically Stable Patients With Major Pulmonary Embolism: Results of a Multicenter Registry. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.3.882

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.