The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Acute Myocardial Infarction Detected in the 12-Lead ECG by Artificial Neural Networks
Abstract
Background The 12-lead ECG, together with patient history and clinical findings, remains the most important method for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Automated interpretation of ECG is widely used as decision support for less experienced physicians. Recent reports have demonstrated that artificial neural networks can be used to improve selected aspects of conventional rule-based interpretation programs. The purpose of this study was to detect acute myocardial infarction in the 12-lead ECG with artificial neural networks. Methods and Results A total of 1120 ECGs from patients with acute myocardial infarction and 10 452 control ECGs, recorded at an emergency department with computerized ECGs, were studied. Artificial neural networks were trained to detect acute myocardial infarction by use of measurements from the 12 ST-T segments of each ECG, together with the correct diagnosis. After this training process, the performance of the neural networks was compared with that of a widely used ECG interpretation program and the classification of an experienced cardiologist. The neural networks showed higher sensitivities and discriminant power than both the interpretation program and cardiologist. The sensitivity of the neural networks was 15.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.4 to 18.6) higher than that of the interpretation program compared at a specificity of 95.4% ( P <.00001) and 10.5% (95% CI, 7.2 to 13.6) higher than the cardiologist at a specificity of 86.3% ( P <.00001). Conclusions Artificial neural networks can be used to improve automated ECG interpretation for acute myocardial infarction. The networks may be useful as decision support even for the experienced ECG readers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Introduction to neural networks
Cross, S. S., Harrison, R. F., & Kennedy, R. L. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91746-2 · Cited by 615
Cited by
Khan, J., Wei, J. S., Ringnér, M., Saal, L. H., Ladanyi, M., Westermann, F., Berthold, F., Schwab, M., Antonescu, C. R., Peterson, C., et al. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/89044 · Cited by 2,644
Improving Safety with Information Technology
Bates, D. W., & Gawande, A. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa020847 · Cited by 1,544
Costs and benefits of health information technology.
Shekelle, P. G., Morton, S. C., & Keeler, E. B. (2006) · doi:10.23970/ahrqepcerta132 · Cited by 501
A review of evidence of health benefit from artificial neural networks in medical intervention
Lisboa, P. J. G. (2002) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(01)00111-3 · Cited by 458
Multiscale Energy and Eigenspace Approach to Detection and Localization of Myocardial Infarction
Sharma, L. N., Tripathy, R. K., & Dandapat, S. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2015.2405134 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedén, B., Öhlin, H., Rittner, R., & Edenbrandt, L.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1997-09-16
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1798-1802
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2112827290
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acute Myocardial Infarction Detected in the 12-Lead ECG by Artificial Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1798
- The paper
- Hedén, B., Öhlin, H., Rittner, R., & Edenbrandt, L. (1997). Acute Myocardial Infarction Detected in the 12-Lead ECG by Artificial Neural Networks. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.96.6.1798
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.