The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predictors of Stroke Complicating Carotid Artery Stenting
Open accessAbstract
Background —The evolving technique of carotid stenting is being evaluated as an alternative to endarterectomy. Identification of the factors that predispose a patient to neurological complications would facilitate further refinement of the technique and optimize patient selection. Methods and Results —We analyzed the impact of various clinical, morphological, and procedural determinants on the development of procedural strokes in 231 patients who underwent elective (primary) stenting of 271 extracranial carotid arteries. The mean age of the patients was 68.7±10 years, 165 (71%) were males, and 139 (60%) had symptoms attributed to the lesion treated. This series represented a high-risk subset with 164 patients (71%) having significant coronary artery disease, 91 (39%) having bilateral disease, and 28 (12%) having contralateral carotid occlusion. Of the treated vessels, 59 (22%) had prior carotid endarterectomy, 66 (24%) had ulcerated plaques, and 87 (32%) had calcified lesions. Only 37 treated vessels (14%) would have been eligible for inclusion in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET). There were 17 (6.2%) minor and 2 (0.7%) major strokes during and within 30 days of the procedure. NASCET-eligible patients had a low (2.7%) risk of procedural strokes after carotid stenting. The results of multivariate analysis revealed advanced age ( P =.006) and presence of long or multiple stenoses ( P =.006) as independent predictors of procedural strokes. Conclusions —During this procedural developmental phase of carotid stenting, neurological complications were highly dependent on patient selection. Advanced age and long or multiple stenoses were independent predictors of procedural stroke.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beneficial Effect of Carotid Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Patients with High-Grade Carotid Stenosis
(1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108153250701 · Cited by 8,368
Cited by
Kastrup, A., Gröschel, K., Krapf, H., Brehm, B. R., Dichgans, J., & Schulz, J. B. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000058160.53040.5f · Cited by 567
Qureshi, A. I., Luft, A. R., Sharma, M., Guterman, L. R., & Hopkins, L. N. (2000) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1097/00006123-200006000-00014 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathur, A., Roubin, G. S., Iyer, S. S., Piamsonboon, C., Liu, M. W., Gomez, C. R., Yadav, J. S., Chastain, H. D., Fox, L. M., Dean, L. S., & Vitek, J. J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1998-04-07
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1239-1245
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2002878765
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of Stroke Complicating Carotid Artery Stenting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.97.13.1239
- The paper
- Mathur, A., Roubin, G. S., Iyer, S. S., Piamsonboon, C., Liu, M. W., Gomez, C. R., Yadav, J. S., Chastain, H. D., Fox, L. M., Dean, L. S., & Vitek, J. J. (1998). Predictors of Stroke Complicating Carotid Artery Stenting. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.97.13.1239
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.