The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pathology of Acute and Chronic Coronary Stenting in Humans
Abstract
Background —Despite the increasing use of stents, few reports have described human coronary artery morphology early and late after stenting. Methods and Results —Histology was performed on 55 stents in 35 coronary vessels (32 native arteries and 3 vein grafts) from 32 patients. The mean duration of stent placement was 39±82 days. Fibrin, platelets, and neutrophils were associated with stent struts ≤11 days after deployment. In stents implanted for ≤3 days, only 3% of struts in contact with fibrous plaque had >20 associated inflammatory cells compared with 44% of struts embedded in a lipid core and 36% of struts in contact with damaged media ( P <0.001). Neointimal growth determined late histological success, and increased neointimal growth correlated with increased stent size relative to the proximal reference lumen area. Neointimal thickness was greater for struts associated with medial damage than struts in contact with plaque ( P <0.0001) or intact media ( P <0.0001). When matched for time since treatment, neointimal cell density in stented arteries was similar to that in unstented arteries that had undergone balloon angioplasty and showed similar proteoglycan deposition. Conclusions —Morphology after coronary stenting demonstrates early thrombus formation and acute inflammation followed by neointimal growth. Medial injury and lipid core penetration by struts result in increased inflammation. Neointima increases as the ratio of stent area to reference lumen area increases. Deployment strategies that reduce medial damage and avoid stent oversizing may lower the frequency of in-stent restenosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Stone, G. W., Ellis, S. G., Cox, D. A., Hermiller, J., O'Shaughnessy, C., Mann, J. T., Turco, M., Caputo, R., Bergin, P., Greenberg, J., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032441 · Cited by 2,749
Newby, A. C. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2003 · Cited by 817
Pathological Mechanisms of Fatal Late Coronary Stent Thrombosis in Humans
Farb, A., Burke, A. P., Kolodgie, F. D., & Virmani, R. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000091115.05480.b0 · Cited by 478
Self-citationCoronary in-stent restenosis: Current status and future strategies
Lowe, H. C., Oesterle, S. N., & Khachigian, L. M. (2002) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01742-9 · Cited by 414
Ribichini, F., Tomai, F., De Luca, G., Boccuzzi, G., Presbitero, P., Pesarini, G., Ferrero, V., Ghini, A. S., Abukaresh, R., Aurigemma, C., et al. (2011) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.11.027 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Farb, A., Sangiorgi, G., Carter, A. J., Walley, V. M., Edwards, W. D., Schwartz, R. S., & Virmani, R.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1999-01-12
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-52
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2063973040
- Cited by
- 871
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 43.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathology of Acute and Chronic Coronary Stenting in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.99.1.44
- The paper
- Farb, A., Sangiorgi, G., Carter, A. J., Walley, V. M., Edwards, W. D., Schwartz, R. S., & Virmani, R. (1999). Pathology of Acute and Chronic Coronary Stenting in Humans. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.1.44
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.