The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Pacing Chamber and Atrioventricular Delay on Acute Systolic Function of Paced Patients With Congestive Heart Failure
Abstract
Background —Previous studies of pacing therapy for dilated congestive heart failure (CHF) have not established the relative importance of pacing site, AV delay, and patient heterogeneity on outcome. These variables were compared by a novel technique that evaluated immediate changes in hemodynamic function during brief periods of atrial-synchronous ventricular pacing. Methods and Results —Twenty-seven CHF patients with severe left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and LV conduction disorder were implanted with endocardial pacing leads in the right atrium and right ventricle (RV) and an epicardial lead on the LV and instrumented with micromanometer catheters in the LV, aorta, and RV. Patients in normal sinus rhythm were stimulated in the RV, LV, or both ventricles simultaneously (BV) at preselected AV delays in a repeating 5-paced/15-nonpaced beat sequence. Maximum LV pressure derivative (LV+dP/dt) and aortic pulse pressure (PP) changed immediately at pacing onset, increasing at a patient-specific optimal AV delay in 20 patients with wide surface QRS (180±22 ms) and decreasing at short AV delays in 5 patients with narrower QRS (128±12 ms) ( P <0.0001). Overall, BV and LV pacing increased LV+dP/dt and PP more than RV pacing ( P <0.01), whereas LV pacing increased LV+dP/dt more than BV pacing ( P <0.01). Conclusions —In this population, CHF patients with sufficiently wide surface QRS benefit from atrial-synchronous ventricular pacing, LV stimulation is required for maximum acute benefit, and the maximum benefit at any site occurs with a patient-specific AV delay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cardiac Resynchronization in Chronic Heart Failure
Abraham, W. T., Fisher, W. G., Smith, A. L., Delurgio, D. B., Leon, A. R., Loh, E., Kocovic, D. Z., Packer, M., Clavell, A. L., Hayes, D. L., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa013168 · Cited by 4,648
2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy
Glikson, M., Nielsen, J. C., Kronborg, M. B., Michowitz, Y., Auricchio, A., Barbash, I. M., Barrabés, J. A., Boriani, G., Braunschweig, F., Brignole, M., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364 · Cited by 2,019
Self-citationDaubert, J.-C., Saxon, L., Adamson, P. B., Auricchio, A., Berger, R. D., Beshai, J. F., Breithard, O., Brignole, M., Cleland, J., DeLurgio, D. B., et al. (2012) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.025 · Cited by 467
Self-citationAuricchio, A., Kloss, M., Trautmann, S. I., Rodner, S., & Klein, H. (2002) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9149(01)02200-7 · Cited by 99
Self-citationIler, M. A., Hu, T., Ayyagari, S., Callahan, T. D., Civello, K. C., Thal, S. G., Wilkoff, B. L., & Chung, M. K. (2008) · The American Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.08.043 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Auricchio, A., Stellbrink, C., Block, M., Sack, S., Vogt, J., Bakker, P., Klein, H., Kramer, A., Ding, J., Salo, R., Tockman, B., Pochet, T., & Spinelli, J.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1999-06-15
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2993-3001
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W1977301303
- Cited by
- 1,152
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.