The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pressure Wave Reflection Assessed From the Peripheral Pulse: Is a Transfer Function Necessary?
Open accessAbstract
Synthesis of the aortic pressure waveform by application of a transfer function to the radial pulse allows the estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure and aortic augmentation index, an index of pressure wave reflection derived from the early systolic component of the waveform. The accuracy of this approach for determining the aortic augmentation index has been questioned, however, and it may be possible to derive similar information without using a transfer function. We compared aortic systolic blood pressure and the aortic augmentation index obtained from carotid and radial arteries with the use of transfer functions. We examined the correlation between the aortic augmentation index and a radial augmentation index obtained without use of a transfer function. Arterial tonometry (Sphygmocor) was performed in 84 subjects including healthy volunteers (n=30), subjects with essential hypertension (n=30), and patients with coronary artery disease (n=24). Effects of nitroglycerine and norepinephrine on aortic and radial augmentation index were examined in 12 healthy volunteers. Values of aortic systolic pressure obtained from radial and carotid arteries by using transfer functions were in acceptable agreement ( R =0.98, difference=−0.9±4.6 mm Hg; mean±SD, n=84), but those of aortic augmentation index differed especially in control subjects ( R =0.47, difference=−3.8±12.4%). Aortic augmentation index was, however, closely correlated with radial augmentation index ( R =0.96, n=84). Nitroglycerine and norepinephrine produced parallel changes in the aortic and radial augmentation index. Our findings question the use of a transfer function to obtain the aortic augmentation index but suggest that similar information on central pressure wave reflection can be obtained directly from the radial pulse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Chen, C.-H., Nevo, E., Fetics, B., Pak, P. H., Yin, F. C. P., Maughan, W. L., & Kass, D. A. (1997) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.95.7.1827 · Cited by 1,307
KARAMANOGLU, M., O'ROURKE, M. F., AVOLIO, A. P., & KELLY, R. P. (1993) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/14.2.160 · Cited by 873
Cited by
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications
Laurent, S., Cockcroft, J., Van Bortel, L., Boutouyrie, P., Giannattasio, C., Hayoz, D., Pannier, B., Vlachopoulos, C., Wilkinson, I., Struijker-Boudier, H., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254 · Cited by 6,077
Vascular stiffening and arterial complianceImplications for systolic blood pressure
SCHIFFRIN, E. (2004) · American Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.08.019 · Cited by 183
Manisty, C. H., & Hughes, A. D. (2013) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04342.x · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Millasseau, S. C., Patel, S. J., Redwood, S. R., Ritter, J. M., & Chowienczyk, P. J.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1016-1020
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2115297563
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pressure Wave Reflection Assessed From the Peripheral Pulse: Is a Transfer Function Necessary? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.0000057574.64076.a5
- The paper
- Millasseau, S. C., Patel, S. J., Redwood, S. R., Ritter, J. M., & Chowienczyk, P. J. (2003). Pressure Wave Reflection Assessed From the Peripheral Pulse: Is a Transfer Function Necessary? Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.0000057574.64076.a5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.