Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is More Prevalent in Blacks Than Whites in the General Population: The Dallas Heart Study

Open access
Drazner, Mark H., Dries, Daniel L., Peshock, Ronald M., Cooper, Richard S., Klassen, Chris, Kazi, Farhana, Willett, DuWayne, Victor, Ronald G.·2005·Hypertension

Abstract

Although recent studies have suggested that blacks compared with whites have an increased prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, it remains uncertain whether this is true despite adjustment for body composition (fat mass and fat-free mass) and when assessed by cardiac MRI in the general population. The Dallas Heart Study is a population-based study of Dallas County in which 1335 black and 858 white participants 30 to 67 years of age underwent detailed assessment including dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan to measure body composition and cardiac MRI. Left ventricular hypertrophy, whether defined by indexation to body surface area ( P <0.001), fat-free mass ( P =0.002), or height 2.7 ( P <0.001) was 2- to 3-fold more common in black versus white women. Similar results were seen when comparing black and white men ( P <0.001 when left ventricular hypertrophy was indexed to body surface area or height 2.7 and P =0.05 when indexed to fat-free mass). Ethnic disparities in left ventricular mass persisted in multivariable models despite adjustment for fat mass, fat-free mass, systolic blood pressure, age, gender, and measures of socioeconomic status. We conclude that blacks compared with whites have increased left ventricular mass and a 2- to 3-fold higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy in the general population, as assessed by cardiac MRI. The ethnic differences in left ventricular mass are independent of differences in body composition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.0000169972.96201.8e

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Drazner, M. H., Dries, D. L., Peshock, R. M., Cooper, R. S., Klassen, C., Kazi, F., Willett, D., & Victor, R. G.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2005-07
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
124-129
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2154838605
Cited by
320
References
30
FWCI
7.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is More Prevalent in Blacks Than Whites in the General Population: The Dallas Heart Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.0000169972.96201.8e
The paper
Drazner, M. H., Dries, D. L., Peshock, R. M., Cooper, R. S., Klassen, C., Kazi, F., Willett, D., & Victor, R. G. (2005). Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is More Prevalent in Blacks Than Whites in the General Population: The Dallas Heart Study. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.0000169972.96201.8e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.