The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological variability in Wistar-Kyoto rats. Implications for research with the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Open accessAbstract
The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) initially bred in Kyoto is the most widely studied animal model of essential hypertension. As controls for the SHR, most workers have used normotensive descendants of Wistar rats from the colony in Kyoto from which the SHR strain was derived (Wistar-Kyoto rats, WKY). But the presumption that WKY are serviceable controls for SHR rests on the tacit assumption that all WKY constitute a single inbred strain. It appears, however, that whereas the National Institutes of Health distributed breeding stocks of SHR after they had been fully inbred (i.e., after 20 generations of brother-sister mating), the breeding stocks of WKY were distributed before they had been fully inbred. Accordingly, the biological variability of WKY may be greater than that of SHR. To investigate this possibility, we obtained SHR and WKY from two of the largest commercial suppliers in the United States and systematically measured the growth rate and blood pressure of these rats under identical physical and metabolic conditions. We found that WKY from one source differed from those of the other in both growth rate and blood pressure. In contrast, the SHR from the two suppliers were not different with respect to either growth rate or blood pressure. Because the National Institutes of Health may have distributed breeding stocks of WKY as early as the F6 generation, it is possible that rats currently designated as WKY do not constitute a single inbred strain. Thus, interpretation of studies employing "the Wistar-Kyoto rat strain" as a control for the SHR may be much more problematic than has previously been recognized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development of a Strain of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
OKAMOTO, K., & AOKI, K. (1963) · Japanese Circulation Journal · doi:10.1253/jcj.27.282 · Cited by 2,545
Cited by
Renal Autoregulation in Health and Disease
Carlström, M., Wilcox, C. S., & Arendshorst, W. J. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00042.2012 · Cited by 485
Genetic Analysis of Inherited Hypertension in the Rat
Rapp, J. P. (2000) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2000.80.1.135 · Cited by 422
Rodent Genetics, Models, and Genotyping Methods
Wildt, S. J., Brooks, A. I., & Russell, R. J. (2008) · Sourcebook of Models for Biomedical Research · doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-285-4_20 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurtz, T. W., & Morris, R. C.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 127-131
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2109812957
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological variability in Wistar-Kyoto rats. Implications for research with the spontaneously hypertensive rat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.10.1.127
- The paper
- Kurtz, T. W., & Morris, R. C. (1987). Biological variability in Wistar-Kyoto rats. Implications for research with the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.10.1.127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.