The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An overview of randomized trials of sodium reduction and blood pressure.
Open accessAbstract
To test for effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure and to provide precise estimates of their magnitude, we conducted an overview of randomized clinical trials that aimed to reduce the intake of sodium in human subjects. We excluded from pooled analyses trials with confounded designs, those that compared intake levels beyond the usual range in the population, and those without published reports. Two reviewers abstracted information in duplicate and differences were reconciled. Twenty-three trials with outcome data from an aggregate of 1,536 subjects were included. Data were pooled both separately for hypertensive and normotensive subjects and for all trials combined. With the use of sample size weighting, blood pressure reductions (net of controls) were 4.9 +/- 1.3/2.6 +/- 0.8 mm Hg (systolic and diastolic, respectively, with 95% confidence limits) in hypertensive subjects and 1.7 +/- 1.0/1.0 +/- 0.7 mm Hg in normotensive subjects. The combined blood pressure reductions were 2.9 +/- 0.8/1.6 +/- 0.5 mm Hg. These changes were associated with mean reduction of urinary sodium excretion ranging from 16 to 171 mmol/24 hr for individual trials. A dose-response relation across trials was found, both in normotensive and in hypertensive subjects. These results indicate that sodium reduction lowers mean blood pressure in both hypertensive and normotensive individuals for periods of at least several months. The findings are highly consistent with results of observational epidemiological studies and have implications for preventive strategies of blood pressure control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
INTERSALT study findings. Public health and medical care implications
Stamler, J., Rose, G., Stamler, R., Elliott, P., Dyer, A., & Marmot, M. (1989) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.14.5.570 · Cited by 426
Self-citationThe Hypertension Prevention Trial: Three-Year Effects of Dietary Changes on Blood Pressure
Hypertension Prevention Trial Research Group (1990) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1990.00390130131021 · Cited by 212
Cited by
Racial discrimination and blood pressure: the CARDIA Study of young black and white adults
Krieger, N., & Sidney, S. (1996) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.86.10.1370 · Cited by 1,296
He, F. J., & MacGregor, G. A. (2002) · Journal of Human Hypertension · doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1001459 · Cited by 810
Graudal, N. A., Hubeck-Graudal, T., & Jurgens, G. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004022.pub4 · Cited by 620
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Stress Reduction for Hypertension in Older African Americans
Schneider, R. H., Staggers, F., Alexander, C. N., Sheppard, W., Rainforth, M., Kondwani, K., Smith, S., & King, C. G. (1995) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.26.5.820 · Cited by 373
McCraty, R., Atkinson, M., & Tomasino, D. (2003) · The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine · doi:10.1089/107555303765551589 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- Cutler, J. A., Follmann, D., Elliott, P., & Suh, I.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1_supplement
- Pages
- I27-33
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W2082508076
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview of randomized trials of sodium reduction and blood pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.17.1_suppl.i27
- The paper
- Cutler, J. A., Follmann, D., Elliott, P., & Suh, I. (1991). An overview of randomized trials of sodium reduction and blood pressure. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.17.1_suppl.i27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.