Cited by 1,296Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Racial discrimination and blood pressure: the CARDIA Study of young black and white adults

Open access
Krieger, N, Sidney, S·1996·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined associations between blood pressure and self reported experiences of racial discrimination and responses to unfair treatment. METHODS: Survey data were collected in year 7 (1992/93) of the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, a prospective multisite community-based investigation. Participants included 831 Black men, 1143 Black women, 1006 White men, and 1106 White women 25 to 37 years old. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure among working-class Black adults reporting that they typically accepted unfair treatment and had experienced racial discrimination in none of seven situations was about 7 mm Hg higher than among those reporting that they challenged unfair treatment and experienced racial discrimination in one or two of the situations. Among professional Black adults, systolic blood pressure was 9 to 10 mm Hg lower among those reporting that they typically challenged unfair treatment and had not experienced racial discrimination. Black-White differences in blood pressure were substantially reduced by taking into account reported experiences of racial discrimination and responses to unfair treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Research on racial/ ethnic distributions of blood pressure should take into account how discrimination may harm health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.86.10.1370

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Socially inflicted trauma is a pathway linking racial discrimination to increased risk of hypertension among African Americans.

    “(3) socially inflicted trauma : perceiving, recalling or anticipating interpersonal racial discrimination provokes fear and anger, triggering the 'flight-or-fight' response”

    From Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: An ecosocial perspective (2001) · cites this paper as [116]

    The indexed Abstract (page unavailable) reports associations between racial discrimination, responses to unfair treatment, and systolic blood pressure among Black CARDIA participants. It does not describe socially inflicted trauma or establish that perceiving, recalling, or anticipating discrimination triggers fear, anger, and a fight-or-flight response; the indexed full-text area contains only a PDF link and references. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The possibility that the relationship between racism and blood pressure may be curvilinear was not explored in the current meta-analysis due to limitations in the statistical analysis program used.

    “Although some research has suggested the relationship between racism and blood pressure may be curvilinear [121, 281, 304, 402–403], this possibility was not explored in the current meta-analysis due to limitations in the statistical analysis program we utilized.”

    From Racism as a Determinant of Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015) · cites this paper as [403]

    The available Abstract reports blood-pressure differences across groups defined by discrimination experiences, responses to unfair treatment, and social class, but does not address whether the relationship is curvilinear. Searches for a curvilinear or nonlinear pattern found no supporting passage. The meta-analysis’s software limitation is the citing authors’ own explanation, not a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krieger, N., & Sidney, S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
1996-10
Volume
86
Issue
10
Pages
1370-1378
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2166176269
Cited by
1,296
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 75
FWCI
104.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r29hl051151-05)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC-84048, 1-R 29-HL51151-01, N01-HC-84047)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
racial discrimination, blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, black-white disparities, young adults, discrimination experiences, cardiovascular health, CARDIA study
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Blood Pressure, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Occupations, Prejudice, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review