The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conduit artery compliance and distensibility are not necessarily reduced in hypertension.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to investigate whether the elastic behavior of conduit arteries of humans or rats is altered as a result of concomitant hypertension. Forearm arterial cross-sectional compliance-pressure curves were determined noninvasively by means of a high precision ultrasonic echo-tracking device coupled to a photoplethysmograph (Finapres system) allowing simultaneous arterial diameter and finger blood pressure monitoring. Seventeen newly diagnosed hypertensive patients with a humeral blood pressure of 163/103 +/- 4.4/2.2 mm Hg (mean +/- SEM) and 17 age- and sex-matched normotensive controls with a humeral blood pressure of 121/77 +/- 3.2/1.9 mm Hg were included in the study. Compliance-pressure curves were also established at the carotid artery of 16-week-old anesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats (n = 14) as well as Wistar-Kyoto normotensive animals (n = 15) using the same echo-tracking device. In these animals, intra-arterial pressure was monitored in the contralateral carotid artery. Mean blood pressures averaged 197 +/- 4 and 140 +/- 3 mm Hg in the hypertensive and normotensive rats, respectively. Despite the considerable differences in blood pressure, the diameter-pressure and cross-sectional compliance-pressure and distensibility-pressure curves were not different when hypertensive patients or animals were compared with their respective controls. These results suggest that the elastic behavior of a medium size muscular artery (radial) in humans and of an elastic artery (carotid) in rats is not necessarily altered by an increase in blood pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physiological aspects of primary hypertension.
Folkow, B. (1982) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1982.62.2.347 · Cited by 1,768
Parati, G., Casadei, R., Groppelli, A., Di Rienzo, M., & Mancia, G. (1989) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.13.6.647 · Cited by 899
Mechanical Properties of Arteries in Vivo
PETERSON, L. H., JENSEN, R. E., & PARNELL, J. (1960) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.8.3.622 · Cited by 679
Cited by
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications
Laurent, S., Cockcroft, J., Van Bortel, L., Boutouyrie, P., Giannattasio, C., Hayoz, D., Pannier, B., Vlachopoulos, C., Wilkinson, I., Struijker-Boudier, H., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254 · Cited by 6,077
Self-citationMitchell, G. F. (2008) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90549.2008 · Cited by 764
Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Arterial Stiffening: Relevance in Development, Aging, and Disease
Lacolley, P., Regnault, V., Segers, P., & Laurent, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2017 · Cited by 734
O’Rourke, M. F., & Nichols, W. W. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000153793.84859.b8 · Cited by 543
Structural and Genetic Bases of Arterial Stiffness
Laurent, S., Boutouyrie, P., & Lacolley, P. (2005) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.0000164580.39991.3d · Cited by 435
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayoz, D., Rutschmann, B., Perret, F., Niederberger, M., Tardy, Y., Mooser, V, Nussberger, J., Waeber, B., & Brunner, H. R.
- Venue
- Hypertension
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4563
- OpenAlex
- W1981418747
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conduit artery compliance and distensibility are not necessarily reduced in hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.20.1.1
- The paper
- Hayoz, D., Rutschmann, B., Perret, F., Niederberger, M., Tardy, Y., Mooser, V, Nussberger, J., Waeber, B., & Brunner, H. R. (1992). Conduit artery compliance and distensibility are not necessarily reduced in hypertension. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.20.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
