Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 587

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Noninvasive Computerized Tail-Cuff System for Measuring Blood Pressure in Mice

Krege, John H., Hodgin, Jeffrey B., Hagaman, John R., Smithies, Oliver·1995·Hypertension

Abstract

Abstract We have validated a noninvasive computerized tail-cuff system for measuring blood pressure in mice. The system was designed to perform all functions automatically, including a programmable routine of cuff inflation and deflation, analysis and assignment of pulse rate and blood pressure, and recording of data electronically. To evaluate this system over a range of blood pressures, we gave groups of mice enalapril or N G -nitro- l -arginine methyl ester in their drinking water. For each of these groups, an equal number of control mice were given nothing in their drinking water. Tail-cuff blood pressures were recorded as the means of blood pressures determined on at least 3 days after at least 7 days of training. Tail-cuff enalapril and control group means were measured both 3 and 4 months after enalapril (or no drug) was begun; the group means at 3 months were not significantly different from the group means at 4 months. These results demonstrate that the system gives reproducible results. After the tail-cuff measurements were completed, intra-arterial blood pressures were attempted in all mice under unrestrained, unanesthetized conditions, and individual mouse (n=22) blood pressures with the use of the two methods were compared. The blood pressures from individual mice by tail-cuff and intra-arterial methods were highly correlated ( r =.86, P <.01). The means for the four mouse groups were also highly correlated ( r =.98, P <.02). These data show that blood pressures measured on trained mice by a computerized noninvasive tail-cuff system are reproducible and correlate well with intra-arterial blood pressures measured on unrestrained, unanesthetized mice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.25.5.1111

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 587

Metadata

Authors
Krege, J. H., Hodgin, J. B., Hagaman, J. R., & Smithies, O.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
1995-05
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
1111-1115
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2051124233
Cited by
587
References
1
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Noninvasive Computerized Tail-Cuff System for Measuring Blood Pressure in Mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.25.5.1111
The paper
Krege, J. H., Hodgin, J. B., Hagaman, J. R., & Smithies, O. (1995). A Noninvasive Computerized Tail-Cuff System for Measuring Blood Pressure in Mice. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.25.5.1111

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.