Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of Carotid Artery Tonometry as a Means of Estimating Augmentation Index of Ascending Aortic Pressure

Chen, Chen-Huan, Ting, Chih-Tai, Nussbacher, Amit, Nevo, Erez, Kass, David A., Pak, Peter, Wang, Shih-Pu, Chang, Mau-Song, Yin, Frank C.P.·1996·Hypertension

Abstract

Abstract Our objective was to validate a carotid artery tonometry–derived augmentation index as a means to estimate augmentation index (AI) of ascending aortic pressure under various physiological conditions. A total of 66 patients (50 men, 16 women; mean age, 55 years; range, 21 to 78 years; 44 in Taiwan and 22 in the Unites States) undergoing diagnostic catheterization were studied. Arterial pressure contours were obtained simultaneously from the right common carotid artery by applanation tonometry with an external micromanometer-tipped probe and from the ascending aorta by a micromanometer-tipped catheter at baseline (n=62), after handgrip (n=36), or after sublingual nitroglycerin administration (n=17). The AI (expressed as percentage values) was calculated as the ratio of amplitude of the pressure wave above its systolic shoulder to the total pulse pressure. The carotid AI was consistently lower than the aortic AI, but the two were highly correlated at baseline and after both handgrip and nitroglycerin. Mean±SD and correlation coefficients were baseline (14±16, 28 + ±17, .77), handgrip (18±19, 32 + ±15, .86), and nitroglycerin (7±12, 18 + ±13, .52). In addition, after adjusting for age, sex, height, blood pressure, heart rate, and study site, the changes of both AIs from baseline values with handgrip or nitroglycerin were highly associated such that the aortic AI could be approximated from the carotid AI with appropriate regression equations. The high correlations and predictable changes after interventions between the central AI and those estimated from noninvasive carotid tonometry suggest that this technique may have wide applicability for many cardiovascular studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.hyp.27.2.168

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Chen, C.-H., Ting, C.-T., Nussbacher, A., Nevo, E., Kass, D. A., Pak, P., Wang, S.-P., Chang, M.-S., & Yin, F. C. P.
Venue
Hypertension
Published
1996-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
168-175
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2150390872
Cited by
401
References
1
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of Carotid Artery Tonometry as a Means of Estimating Augmentation Index of Ascending Aortic Pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.hyp.27.2.168
The paper
Chen, C.-H., Ting, C.-T., Nussbacher, A., Nevo, E., Kass, D. A., Pak, P., Wang, S.-P., Chang, M.-S., & Yin, F. C. P. (1996). Validation of Carotid Artery Tonometry as a Means of Estimating Augmentation Index of Ascending Aortic Pressure. Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.hyp.27.2.168

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.