The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Concept of Negative Interstitial Pressure Based on Pressures in Implanted Perforated Capsules
Open accessAbstract
Over 200 perforated plastic capsules were implanted in different tissues of the dog, and the wounds were allowed to heal. After one month, pressures measured by inserting a needle through the skin and then through a perforation of the capsule into its cavity were always negative in normal tissues, averaging-6.4 mm Hg. The pressure was always positive in edematous tissues. Evidence is presented to indicate that the pressure measured in the capsule is equal to, or nearly equal to, the interstitial fluid pressure in the tissue spaces surrounding the capsule. On the other hand, pressure measurements made by a needle technic failed except in rare instances to give negative values in normal tissues but in edematous tissues gave almost exactly the same values as those recorded by the capsules. Also, pressures measured by the capsules changed in accordance with Starling's law of the capillaries when (a) venous pressure was raised, (b) when arterial pressure was lowered, (c) when the tissues were dehydrated by intravenous infusion of dextran, or (d) when the tissues were hydrated by intravenous infusion of saline. Pressures measured by a needle technique failed to change in accordance with this law in these same experiments. Therefore, it is concluded that needle pressure determinations in non-edematous tissue do not measure the interstitial fluid pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Accessing analytes in biofluids for peripheral biochemical monitoring
Heikenfeld, J., Jajack, A., Feldman, B., Granger, S. W., Gaitonde, S., Begtrup, G., & Katchman, B. A. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0040-3 · Cited by 758
Wiig, H., & Swartz, M. A. (2012) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00037.2011 · Cited by 722
Lymphatic Vessel Network Structure and Physiology
Breslin, J. W., Yang, Y., Scallan, J. P., Sweat, R. S., Adderley, S. P., & Murfee, W. L. (2018) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c180015 · Cited by 341
Body Fluid Dynamics: Back to the Future
Bhave, G., & Neilson, E. G. (2011) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2011080865 · Cited by 215
Interstitial Pressure in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Is Dominated by a Gel-Fluid Phase
DuFort, C. C., DelGiorno, K. E., Carlson, M. A., Osgood, R. J., Zhao, C., Huang, Z., Thompson, C. B., Connor, R. J., Thanos, C. D., Scott Brockenbrough, J., et al. (2016) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2016.03.040 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- GUYTON, A. C., Frank, M., & Abernathy, B.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1963-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 399-414
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W1981471842
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Concept of Negative Interstitial Pressure Based on Pressures in Implanted Perforated Capsules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.12.4.399
- The paper
- GUYTON, A. C., Frank, M., & Abernathy, B. (1963). A Concept of Negative Interstitial Pressure Based on Pressures in Implanted Perforated Capsules. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.12.4.399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.