The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regional differences in myocardial performance in the left ventricle of the dog.
Abstract
To determine whether significant regional differences in shortening exist in the canine left ventricle, the shortening characteristics of small segments of the circumferentially oriented hoop axis fibers and the more longitudinally oriented fibers near the epicardium were examined using pairs of ultrasound crystals placed at three levels of the left ventricular free wall in the open-chest dog. Mean control shortening of the hoop axis fibers near the apex of the left ventricle averaged 20% of the end-diastolic length, significantly greater than shortening at the midventricular (13%) or basal (14%) levels. During transient periods of aortic constriction, end-diastolic length increased significantly and the extent of shortening was maintained for the hoop axis fibers at the apical and midventricular levels; end-diastolic length did not change and shortening decreased at the basal level. The epicardial fibers shortened an average of 5.6% of their end-diastolic length during control conditions at all three sites and showed small, parallel changes in shortening and end-diastolic length during aortic constriction. We conclude that significantly greater hoop axis shortening occurs near the apex of the left ventricle and that at this level a uniformly contracting model is inappropriate. In addition, the response of the hoop axis fibers to increased aortic impedance is not homogeneous, with a significant reduction in shortening occurring only at the base of the left ventricle where end-diastolic length does not increase.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records
Mandel, J. C., Kreda, D. A., Mandl, K. D., Kohane, I. S., & Ramoni, R. B. (2016) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocv189 · Cited by 829
Waldman, L. K., Fung, Y. C., & Covell, J. W. (1985) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.57.1.152 · Cited by 363
Self-citationCarruth, E. D., McCulloch, A. D., & Omens, J. H. (2016) · Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.11.004 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- LeWinter, M. M., Kent, R. S., Kroener, J. M., Carew, T. E., & Covell, J. W.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1975-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-199
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2120363628
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regional differences in myocardial performance in the left ventricle of the dog. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.37.2.191
- The paper
- LeWinter, M. M., Kent, R. S., Kroener, J. M., Carew, T. E., & Covell, J. W. (1975). Regional differences in myocardial performance in the left ventricle of the dog. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.37.2.191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.