The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Significance of quiescent smooth muscle migration in the injured rat carotid artery.
Open accessAbstract
Cellular accumulation in the intima of injured artery has generally been attributed to smooth muscle cell proliferation. Since smooth muscle cells in normal artery are found mainly in the media, migration of smooth muscle cells into the intima has been considered a necessary prerequisite for subsequent myointimal thickening. The nondividing medial cells would appear to have no role in the reparative process. We have investigated in the rat ballooned carotid the possibility that nondividing cells might also contribute to injury-induced intimal thickening. All proliferating smooth muscle cells were labeled by 3H-thymidine given by continuous intraperitoneal infusion. The amounts of 3H-thymidine used were not toxic and did not inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation. Autoradiograms performed on histological cross-sections showed a progressive decrease in the fraction of unlabeled cells at 3, 7, and 14 days after carotid injury. However, the actual number of nondividing cells remained constant. The calculated growth fraction for the 14-day period was 40%. A substantial number of unlabeled cells was observed in the intima. These data have led us to conclude that only a small fraction of smooth muscle cells in an artery proliferate in response to the injury stimulus, and do so shortly after injury, or not at all. Furthermore, nondividing, as well as proliferating smooth muscle cells, can migrate and contribute, in a substantial way, to the increase in intimal smooth muscle cell number.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis — An Update
Ross, R. (1986) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198602203140806 · Cited by 4,877
Arterial Remodeling After Coronary Angioplasty: A Serial Intravascular Ultrasound Study
Mintz, G. S., Popma, J. J., Pichard, A. D., Kent, K. M., Satler, L. F., Chiu Wong, S., Hong, M. K., Kovach, J. A., & Leon, M. B. (1996) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.94.1.35 · Cited by 889
Newby, A. C. (2005) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2003 · Cited by 817
The Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis: Atherogenesis and Inflammation
Munro, J. M., & Cotran, R. S. (1989) · Pathology Reviews · 1989 · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4502-5_10 · Cited by 698
PDGF and cardiovascular disease
Raines, E. W. (2004) · Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.cytogfr.2004.03.004 · Cited by 484
Metadata
- Authors
- Clowes, A. W., & Schwartz, S. M.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-145
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2029566146
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance of quiescent smooth muscle migration in the injured rat carotid artery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.56.1.139
- The paper
- Clowes, A. W., & Schwartz, S. M. (1985). Significance of quiescent smooth muscle migration in the injured rat carotid artery. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.56.1.139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.