The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Granulocytes cause reperfusion ventricular dysfunction after 15-minute ischemia in the dog.
Open accessAbstract
Regional ventricular dysfunction (the stunned myocardium) persists for several hours after 15 minutes of ischemia and reperfusion in the dog. Superoxide-radical-induced damage appears to be one of the mechanisms of this injury. We tested whether granulocytes were a direct source of injury in the stunned myocardium in the 15-minute ischemia dog model. Regional function during agranulocytic extracorporeal coronary perfusion (using Leukopak filters) with ischemia and reperfusion was compared with function during a second period of ischemia and reperfusion after removal of the filters (granulocytopenia). Flow reduction and reperfusion flow, preload, afterload, and inotropic stimulation were the same during agranulocytic and granulocytopenic perfusion. During agranulocytic perfusion, stunning did not occur (greater than 100% of preischemic function during reperfusion), but when the filters were removed and about 10% of the normal granulocyte count was present, stunning occurred with only 76% return of function at 60 minutes of reperfusion (p less than 0.01). A second series of studied animals with extracorporeal perfusion and granulocyte replete perfusion all had less than 75% return of regional function, indicating that the agranulocytic perfusion and not the extracorporeal aspects of the experiment prevented stunning. We conclude that granulocytes are the direct source of the injury in stunned myocardium and apparently the main source of superoxide in the 15-minute ischemia dog model. Other possible granulocyte-related mechanisms of reperfusion injury include capillary no-reflow, causing microvascular ischemia and degranulation leading to enzyme-induced damage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Oxygen-Derived Free Radicals in Postischemic Tissue Injury
Epstein, F. H., & McCord, J. M. (1985) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198501173120305 · Cited by 5,399
The “no-reflow” phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog
Kloner, R. A., Ganote, C. E., & Jennings, R. B. (1974) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci107898 · Cited by 1,842
Cited by
Negative Inotropic Effects of Cytokines on the Heart Mediated by Nitric Oxide
Finkel, M. S., Oddis, C. V., Jacob, T. D., Watkins, S. C., Hattler, B. G., & Simmons, R. L. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1631560 · Cited by 1,628
Oxygen-derived free radicals and myocardial reperfusion injury: An overview
Bolli, R. (1991) · Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy · doi:10.1007/bf00054747 · Cited by 295
Kevin, L. G., Camara, A. K. S., Riess, M. L., Novalija, E., & Stowe, D. F. (2003) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00711.2002 · Cited by 272
The red blood cell as an oxygen sensor: what is the evidence?
Ellsworth, M. L. (2000) · Acta Physiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1046/j.1365-201x.2000.00708.x · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Engler, R., & Covell, J. W.
- Venue
- Circulation Research
- Published
- 1987-07
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-28
- ISSN
- 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4571
- OpenAlex
- W2120768528
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Granulocytes cause reperfusion ventricular dysfunction after 15-minute ischemia in the dog. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.61.1.20
- The paper
- Engler, R., & Covell, J. W. (1987). Granulocytes cause reperfusion ventricular dysfunction after 15-minute ischemia in the dog. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.61.1.20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.