Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 508

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NG-nitro L-arginine methyl ester and other alkyl esters of arginine are muscarinic receptor antagonists.

Buxton, I L, Cheek, D J, Eckman, D, Westfall, D P, Sanders, K M, Keef, K D·1993·Circulation Research

Abstract

Analogues of L-arginine with modifications at the terminal guanidino nitrogen and/or the carboxyl terminus of the molecule have been widely used for their ability to inhibit the production of nitric oxide and are thought to be competitive antagonists of nitric oxide synthase. The present studies were designed to test the possibility that these agents are also muscarinic receptor antagonists. Acetylcholine produced concentration-dependent contraction of endothelium-denuded rabbit coronary artery as well as isolated strips of canine colonic smooth muscle. The arginine analogue NG-nitro L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 100 microM) but not NG-monomethyl L-arginine (L-NMMA, 100 microM) significantly shifted these contractile relations to the right, an effect that was not reversed by addition of 1 mM L-arginine. In radioligand binding studies using the muscarinic radioligand [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate and tissues known to contain differing contributions of M1, M2, and M3 muscarinic receptors, addition of increasing concentrations of L-NAME resulted in a monophasic competition of binding with affinities (Ki) ranging from 68 microM in endothelium to 317 microM in whole aorta. Addition of the hydrolysis-resistant guanosine 5'-triphosphate analogue GTP gamma S (100 microM) had no effect on L-NAME competition of [3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate binding. Addition of L-NAME in radioligand binding competition studies using the agonist carbachol did not result in an alteration of the receptor's affinity for agonist, confirming the competitive nature of the interaction of L-NAME with the muscarinic receptor.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.res.72.2.387

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 508

Metadata

Authors
Buxton, I. L., Cheek, D. J., Eckman, D., Westfall, D. P., Sanders, K. M., & Keef, K. D.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
1993-02
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
387-395
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2069174503
Cited by
508
References
12
FWCI
21.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NG-nitro L-arginine methyl ester and other alkyl esters of arginine are muscarinic receptor antagonists. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.72.2.387
The paper
Buxton, I. L., Cheek, D. J., Eckman, D., Westfall, D. P., Sanders, K. M., & Keef, K. D. (1993). NG-nitro L-arginine methyl ester and other alkyl esters of arginine are muscarinic receptor antagonists. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.72.2.387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.