Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 529

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Role of Bradykinin in Protection of Ischemic Preconditioning in Rabbit Hearts

Goto, Mahiko, Liu, Yongge, Yang, Xi-Ming, Ardell, Jeffrey L., Cohen, Michael V., Downey, James M.·1995·Circulation Research

Abstract

Abstract Bradykinin receptor activation has been proposed to be involved in ischemic preconditioning. In the present study, we further investigated the role of this agent in preconditioning in both isolated and in situ rabbit hearts. All hearts were subjected to 30 minutes of regional ischemia followed by reperfusion for 2 hours (in vitro hearts) and 3 hours (in situ hearts). Infarct size was measured by tetrazolium staining and expressed as a percentage of the size of the risk zone. Preconditioning in situ hearts with 5 minutes of ischemia and 10 minutes of reperfusion significantly reduced infarct size to 10.2±2.2% of the risk region (P<.0005 versus control infarct size of 36.7±2.6%). Pretreatment with HOE 140 (26 μg/kg), a bradykinin B 2 receptor blocker, did not alter infarct size in nonpreconditioned hearts (40.6±5.3% infarction) but abolished protection from ischemic preconditioning (34.1±1.6% infarction). However, when HOE 140 was administered during the initial reflow period following 5 minutes of ischemia, protection was no longer abolished (15.6±3.9% infarction versus 13.3±3.8% without HOE 140,P=NS). Bradykinin infusion in isolated hearts mimicked preconditioning, and protection was not affected by pretreatment with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor Nω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester or the prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor indomethacin but could be completely abolished by the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors polymyxin B and staurosporine as well as by HOE 140. HOE 140 could not block the protection of ischemic preconditioning in isolated hearts. That failure was apparently due to the absence of blood-borne kininogens rather than autonomic nerves. When the preconditioning stimulus in the in situ model was amplified with four cycles of 5-minute ischemia/10-minute reperfusion, HOE 140 pretreatment could no longer block protection (infarct size was 10.7±3.5% versus 6.4±2.0% without HOE 140,P=NS). We propose that bradykinin receptors protect by coupling to PKC as do adenosine receptors, and blockade of either receptor will diminish the total stimulus of PKC below threshold and prevent protection. A more intense preconditioning ischemic stimulus can overcome bradykinin receptor blockade, however, by simply enhancing the amount of adenosine and possibly other agonists released.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.res.77.3.611

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 529

Metadata

Authors
Goto, M., Liu, Y., Yang, X.-M., Ardell, J. L., Cohen, M. V., & Downey, J. M.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
1995-09
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
611-621
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W1986905765
Cited by
529
References
0
FWCI
28.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Bradykinin in Protection of Ischemic Preconditioning in Rabbit Hearts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.77.3.611
The paper
Goto, M., Liu, Y., Yang, X.-M., Ardell, J. L., Cohen, M. V., & Downey, J. M. (1995). Role of Bradykinin in Protection of Ischemic Preconditioning in Rabbit Hearts. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.77.3.611

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.