Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distribution and Prevalence of Hyperpolarization-Activated Cation Channel (HCN) mRNA Expression in Cardiac Tissues

Shi, Wenmei, Wymore, Randy, Yu, Hangang, Wu, Jiying, Wymore, Rigel T., Pan, Zongming, Robinson, Richard B., Dixon, Jane E., McKinnon, David, Cohen, Ira S.·1999·Circulation Research

Abstract

Abstract —HCN cation channel mRNA expression was determined in the rabbit heart and neonatal and adult rat ventricle using RNase protection assays. In the rabbit SA node, the dominant HCN transcript is HCN4, representing >81% of the total HCN message. HCN1 is also expressed, representing >18% of the total HCN mRNA. Rabbit Purkinje fibers contained almost equal amounts of HCN1 and HCN4 transcripts with low levels of HCN2, whereas rabbit ventricle contained predominantly HCN2. The SA node contained 25 times the total HCN message of Purkinje fibers and 140 times the total HCN message of ventricle. No reports of hyperpolarization-activated current ( I f ) exist in rabbit Purkinje fibers, and we could not record I f in rabbit ventricular myocytes. To investigate the possible role of isoform switching in determining the voltage dependence of I f , we determined the prevalence of HCN isoforms in neonatal and adult rat ventricle. We had previously determined the threshold for activation of I f to be ≈−70 mV in neonatal rat ventricle and −113 mV in adult rat ventricle. In both neonatal and adult rat ventricle, only HCN2 and HCN4 transcripts are present. The ratio of HCN2 to HCN4 is ≈5:1 in the neonate and 13:1 in the adult. Taken together, these results suggest that different cardiac regions express different isoforms of the HCN family. The HCN1 and HCN4 isoforms are most closely associated with a depolarized threshold for I f activation, whereas the HCN2 isoform is associated with a more negative activation curve. The full text of this article is available at http://www.circresaha.org.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.res.85.1.e1

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1161/res.79.4.659 · doi:10.1161/res.79.4.659
  2. 10.1097/00005344-199811000-00015 · doi:10.1097/00005344-199811000-00015
  3. 10.1007/BF00658491 · doi:10.1007/bf00658491
  4. 10.1016/0167-4889(95)00036-R · doi:10.1016/0167-4889(95)00036-r
  5. 10.2144/97225bm04 · doi:10.2144/97225bm04
  6. 10.1161/res.75.2.8033339 · doi:10.1161/res.75.2.8033339
  7. 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014512 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014512

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Shi, W., Wymore, R., Yu, H., Wu, J., Wymore, R. T., Pan, Z., Robinson, R. B., Dixon, J. E., McKinnon, D., & Cohen, I. S.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
1999-07-09
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
e1-6
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2157578689
Cited by
382
References
15
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution and Prevalence of Hyperpolarization-Activated Cation Channel (HCN) mRNA Expression in Cardiac Tissues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.res.85.1.e1
The paper
Shi, W., Wymore, R., Yu, H., Wu, J., Wymore, R. T., Pan, Z., Robinson, R. B., Dixon, J. E., McKinnon, D., & Cohen, I. S. (1999). Distribution and Prevalence of Hyperpolarization-Activated Cation Channel (HCN) mRNA Expression in Cardiac Tissues. Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.85.1.e1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.