Cited by 116Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Anticardiolipin Antibodies and Risk of Ischemic Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: The Framingham Cohort and Offspring Study

Janardhan, Vallabh, Wolf, Philip A., Kase, Carlos S., Massaro, Joseph M., D’Agostino, Ralph B., Franzblau, Carl, Wilson, Peter W.F.·2004·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— The role of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCLs) as novel risk factors for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) has been a matter of debate. Prior cohort studies included only selected subjects, mostly men. We related serum concentrations of aCLs to incident first ischemic stroke/TIA among men and women in the Framingham Heart Study cohort and offspring. Methods— There were a total of 2712 women (mean age, 59.3 years) and 2262 men (mean age, 58.3 years) free of stroke/TIA at the time of their baseline examinations. An enzyme immunoassay was used to measure aCLs. Optical density of the sample serum compared with the reference serum was defined as the aCL screening ratio (aCL SR). Analyses were based on sex-specific aCL SR quartiles and individual ratios. Results— During the 11-year follow-up, 222 ischemic strokes/TIAs occurred. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, prior cardiovascular disease, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, smoking, C-reactive protein, and total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, an aCL SR of >0.4 (78% of sample) was significantly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke/TIA for women (hazard ratio [HR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 5.4; absolute risk, 3.2%, 95% CI, 2.2 to 4.3) but not in men (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7 to 2.4; absolute risk, 4.5%; 95% CI, 3.0 to 6.0). Similar results were obtained when the higher 3 aCL SR quartiles were compared with the lowest. Conclusions— Elevated serum concentrations of aCLs, independently of other cardiovascular risk factors, significantly predict the risk of future ischemic stroke and TIA in women but not in men.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000117575.48205.2d

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retrospective, case-control and cross-sectional studies with different designs, patient selection criteria, aPL profiles and risk factors have produced contradictory results.

    “Retrospective, [1][2][3][4] case-control [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and cross-sectional 13,14 studies with different designs, patient selection criteria, aPL profiles and risk factors have produced contradictory results.”

    From Risk factors for a first thrombotic event in antiphospholipid antibody carriers: a prospective multicentre follow-up study. (2011) · cites this paper as [4]

    The cited paper is not a retrospective, case-control, or cross-sectional study of the kind listed in the citing sentence. Its Subjects and Definition of Clinical Outcome section says participants were followed for 11 years to identify incident stroke or TIA, and its Discussion explicitly calls the design a prospective population-based cohort study. The paper does acknowledge conflicting earlier findings, but its classification in this list is contrary to our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Stallworth CL, Brey RL. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. In: Bogousslavsky J, Caplan LR, eds. Uncommon Causes of Stroke. Cam- bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001:63-77.
  2. Petri M. Epidemiology of the anti-phospholipid syndrome. J Autoimmun. 2000;15:145-151.
  3. Gorelick PB. Stroke prevention therapy beyond antithrombotics: unifying mechanisms in ischemic stroke pathogenesis and implications for therapy. Stroke. 2002;33:862-875.
  4. Sletnes KE, Smith P, Abdelnoor M, Arnesen H, Wisloff F. Antiphos- pholipid antibodies after myocardial infarction and their relation to mor- tality, reinfarction, and non-haemorrhagic stroke. Lancet. 1992;339: 451-453.
  5. Ahmad E, Stegmayr B, Trifunovic J, Weinehall L, Hallmans G, Lefvert AK. Anticardiolipin antibodies are not an independent risk factor for stroke: an incident case-referent study nested within the MONICA and Vasterbotten Cohort Project. Stroke. 2000;31:1289 -1293.
  6. Brey RL, Abbott RD, Curb JD, Sharp DS, Ross GW, Stallworth CL, Kittner SJ. ␤2-Glycoprotein 1-dependent anticardiolipin antibodies and risk of ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction: the Honolulu Heart Program. Stroke. 2001;32:1701-1706.
  7. Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB. Epidemiology of Stroke. In: Barnett HJM, Mohr JP, Stein BM, Yatsu F, eds. Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 1998:6 -7.
  8. Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Garrison RJ. Monograph Section 34: Some Risk Factors Related to the Annual Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease and Death Using Pooled Repeated Biennial Measurements: Framingham Heart Study, 30-Year Follow-Up. Springfield, Mass: National Technical Information Service; 1987:1-459.
  9. Rost NS, Wolf PA, Kase CS, Kelly-Hayes M, Silbershatz H, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB, Franzblau C, Wilson PWF. Plasma concentration of C-reactive protein and risk of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: the Framingham study. Stroke. 2001;32:2575-2579.
  10. Harris EN. The second international anti-cardiolipin standardization workshop/The Kingston Anti-Phospholipid Antibody Study (KAPS) Group. Am J Clin Pathol. 1990;94:476 -484.
  11. Harris EN, Gharavi AE, Patel SP, Hughes GRV. Evaluation of the anti-cardiolipin antibody test: report of an international workshop held 4 April 1986. Clin Exp Immunol. 1987;68:215-222.
  12. Levine SR, Salowich-Palm L, Sawaya KL, Perry M, Spencer HJ, Winkler HJ, Alam ZJLC. IgG Anticardiolipin antibody titer Ͼ40 GPL and the risk of subsequent thrombo-occlusive events and death: a prospective cohort study. Stroke. 1997;28:1660 -1665.
  13. Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Stroke Study Group (APASS). Anticar- diolipin antibodies and the risk of recurrent thrombo-occlusive events and death. Neurology. 1997;48:91-94.
  14. Tuhrim S, Rand J, Wu X, Weinberger J, Horowitz DR, Goldman ME, Godbold JH. Elevated anticardiolipin antibody titer is a stroke risk factor in a multiethnic population independent of isotype or degree of positivity. Stroke. 1999;30:1561-1565.
  15. Ahmed SA, Verthelyi D. Antibodies to cardiolipin in normal C57BL/6J mice: induction by estrogen but not dihydrotestosterone. J Autoimmun. 1993;6:265-279.
  16. Meroni PL, Raschi E, Testoni C, Tincani A, Balestrieri G. Antiphos- pholipid antibodies and the endothelium. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2001;27:587-602.
  17. Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Stroke Study (APASS) Group. Antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent thrombo-occlusive events: the Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Stroke Study (APASS). Neurology. 2002;58:A257-A258. Abstract.
  18. Douketis JD, Crowther MA, Julian JA, Stewart K, Donovan D, Kaminska EA, Laskin CA, Ginsburg KS. Primary prevention of thromboembolism in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with antiphospholipid anti- bodies. Thromb Haemost. 1999;82:1028 -1032.
  19. Petri M. Management of thrombosis in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2001;27:633-660.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janardhan, V., Wolf, P. A., Kase, C. S., Massaro, J. M., D’Agostino, R. B., Franzblau, C., & Wilson, P. W. F.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Stroke
Published
2004-03
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
736-741
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2152437468
Cited by
116
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • School of Medicine, Boston University (N01-HC25195)
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc25195-41-0-1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01‐HC25195)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS17950, N01‐HC‐25195, 5R01 NS 17950-21, R01NS017950)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
anticardiolipin antibodies, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, sex differences, stroke risk prediction, Framingham Heart Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain Ischemia, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Antibodies, Anticardiolipin, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Risk Assessment, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review