The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Racial Variations in Location and Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Abstract
Background and Purpose— Risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) vary by location. Incidence rates of ICH are known to be higher in American blacks than whites, but how rates may differ by hemorrhage location is unknown. We sought to define incidence rates for different ICH locations in a biracial population. Methods— All hospitalized patients age ≥20 years with spontaneous ICH were identified in the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky metropolitan area from May 1998 to July 2001 and August 2002 to April 2003. Incidence rates per 100 000 persons were age, sex, and race adjusted as appropriate to the 2000 US population. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated from unadjusted incidence rates. Results— There were 1038 qualifying ICHs. Annual incidence rates per 100 000 persons ≥20 years of age were 48.9 for blacks and 26.6 for whites. Annual incidence rates per 100 000 blacks in lobar, deep cerebral, brain stem, and cerebellar locations were 15.2, 25.7, 5.1, and 2.9, respectively. Annual incidence rates per 100 000 whites in the same locations were 9.4, 13.0, 1.3, and 2.9. The greatest excess risk of ICH in blacks compared with whites was found among young to middle-aged (35 to 54 years) persons with brain stem (RR, 9.8; 95% CI, 4.2 to 23.0) and deep cerebral (RR, 4.5; 3.0 to 6.8) hemorrhage. Conclusions— The excess risk of ICH in American blacks is largely attributable to higher hemorrhage rates in young and middle-aged persons, particularly for deep cerebral and brain stem locations. Hypertension is the predominant risk factor for hemorrhages in these locations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiology and treatment of stroke: present status and future perspectives
Kuriakose, D., & Xiao, Z. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21207609 · Cited by 1,350
Broderick, J., Connolly, S., Feldmann, E., Hanley, D., Kase, C., Krieger, D., Mayberg, M., Morgenstern, L., Ogilvy, C. S., Vespa, P., et al. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.183689 · Cited by 1,125
Self-citation(2006) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000094831 · Cited by 411
Risk Factors for Intracerebral Hemorrhage in a Pooled Prospective Study
Sturgeon, J. D., Folsom, A. R., Longstreth, W. T., Shahar, E., Rosamond, W. D., & Cushman, M. (2007) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.107.487090 · Cited by 364
Intracerebral hemorrhage: an update on diagnosis and treatment
Hostettler, I. C., Seiffge, D. J., & Werring, D. J. (2019) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/14737175.2019.1623671 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Flaherty, M. L., Woo, D., Haverbusch, M., Sekar, P., Khoury, J., Sauerbeck, L., Moomaw, C. J., Schneider, A., Kissela, B., Kleindorfer, D., & Broderick, J. P.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 934-937
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2041467804
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Racial Variations in Location and Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000160756.72109.95
- The paper
- Flaherty, M. L., Woo, D., Haverbusch, M., Sekar, P., Khoury, J., Sauerbeck, L., Moomaw, C. J., Schneider, A., Kissela, B., Kleindorfer, D., & Broderick, J. P. (2005). Racial Variations in Location and Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000160756.72109.95
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.