Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Translating the Results of Randomized Trials into Clinical Practice: The Challenge of Warfarin Candidacy Among Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Open access
Hylek, Elaine M., D’Antonio, James, Evans-Molina, Carmella, Shea, Carol, Henault, Lori E., Regan, Susan·2006·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose— Numerous studies have documented under use of warfarin particularly among elderly patients. A better understanding of the discrepancy between trials and clinical practice will help inform stroke prevention strategies in this vulnerable age group. The study objective was to prospectively assess the use of antithrombotic therapy among a contemporary cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation at the time of hospital discharge. In addition to baseline characteristics, we sought to define the physician-cited reason for not prescribing warfarin for each patient. Methods— Patients with atrial fibrillation were prospectively identified and followed to hospital discharge. Enrolled patients were ≥65 years of age, not taking warfarin on admission, and had their longitudinal care provided at our institution. Predictors of warfarin use were determined and physician-cited contraindications were compared across age groups. Results— Fifty-one percent (n=206) of patients were discharged on warfarin: 75% of those 65 to 69 years of age, 59% 70 to 79, 45% 80 to 89, and 24% age ≥90 years. Of the remaining 199 patients, 83% had ≥2 major risk factors for stroke, and 98% were felt to have contraindications including nearly 25% who were unable to tolerate warfarin in the past. Among patients age ≥80, falling was the most often physician-cited reason for not prescribing warfarin (41%) followed by hemorrhage (28%). Conclusion— Our findings suggest that many elderly patients at high risk for stroke may not be optimal candidates for anticoagulant therapy. There is a pressing need for alternative stroke prevention strategies for this expanding patient population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.0000209239.71702.ce

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
Hylek, E. M., D’Antonio, J., Evans-Molina, C., Shea, C., Henault, L. E., & Regan, S.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2006-04
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
1075-1080
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2006269130
Cited by
250
References
5
FWCI
12.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Translating the Results of Randomized Trials into Clinical Practice: The Challenge of Warfarin Candidacy Among Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000209239.71702.ce
The paper
Hylek, E. M., D’Antonio, J., Evans-Molina, C., Shea, C., Henault, L. E., & Regan, S. (2006). Translating the Results of Randomized Trials into Clinical Practice: The Challenge of Warfarin Candidacy Among Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000209239.71702.ce

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.