The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation–Induced Corticomotor Excitability and Associated Motor Skill Acquisition in Chronic Stroke
Abstract
Background and Purpose— Although there is some early evidence showing the value of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in stroke rehabilitation, the therapeutic effect of high-frequency rTMS, along with the physiology of rTMS-induced corticomotor excitability supporting motor learning in stroke, has not been established. This study investigated high-frequency rTMS-induced cortical excitability and the associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke patients. Methods— Fifteen patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke (13 men; mean age 53.5 years) practiced a complex, sequential finger motor task using their paretic fingers either after 10 Hz or sham rTMS over the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1). Both the changes in the behavior and corticomotor excitability before and after the intervention were examined by measuring the movement accuracy, the movement time, and the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. A separate repeated-measures ANOVA and correlation statistics were used to determine the main and interaction effects as well as relationship between the changes in the behavioral and corticomotor excitability. Results— High-frequency rTMS resulted in a significantly larger increase in the MEP amplitude than the sham rTMS ( P <0.01), and the plastic change was positively associated with an enhanced motor performance accuracy ( P <0.05). Conclusions— High-frequency rTMS of the affected motor cortex can facilitate practice-dependent plasticity and improve the motor learning performance in chronic stroke victims.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early consolidation in human primary motor cortex
Muellbacher, W., Ziemann, U., Wissel, J., Dang, N., Kofler, M., Facchini, S., Boroojerdi, B., Poewe, W., & Hallett, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature712 · Cited by 803
Self-citation
Cited by
Lefaucheur, J.-P., André-Obadia, N., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Cantello, R. M., Cincotta, M., de Carvalho, M., De Ridder, D., et al. (2014) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.021 · Cited by 2,119
Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke
Dimyan, M. A., & Cohen, L. G. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.200 · Cited by 732
Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation?
Ridding, M. C., & Rothwell, J. C. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2169 · Cited by 687
Enhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Luber, B., & Lisanby, S. H. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.007 · Cited by 508
Modifying motor learning through gating and homeostatic metaplasticity
Ziemann, U., & Siebner, H. R. (2008) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2007.08.003 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, Y.-H., You, S. H., Ko, M.-H., Park, J.-W., Lee, K. H., Jang, S. H., Yoo, W.-K., & Hallett, M.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1471-1476
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2147464541
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation–Induced Corticomotor Excitability and Associated Motor Skill Acquisition in Chronic Stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.0000221233.55497.51
- The paper
- Kim, Y.-H., You, S. H., Ko, M.-H., Park, J.-W., Lee, K. H., Jang, S. H., Yoo, W.-K., & Hallett, M. (2006). Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation–Induced Corticomotor Excitability and Associated Motor Skill Acquisition in Chronic Stroke. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000221233.55497.51
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.