The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The natural history of carotid arterial disease in asymptomatic patients with cervical bruits.
Abstract
A prospective study was initiated in January 1980 to follow with Duplex scanning a consecutive series of 167 asymptomatic patients with cervical bruits. Patients were seen at six month intervals for the first year and yearly thereafter. Based on previously validated criteria, disease at the carotid bifurcation was classified into 6 categories: Normal, 1-15% diameter reduction, 16-49%, 50-79%, 80-99%, and occlusion. Patients were evaluated to assess: the occurrence of new neurological symptoms, the stability of the lesions at the carotid bifurcation, and the possible role of risk indicators on disease changes. During follow-up, ten patients became symptomatic (6 with TIA's and 4 with stroke). The development of symptoms was accompanied by disease progression in 8 patients. By life table analysis, the annual rate occurrence of symptoms was 4%. The mean annual rate of disease progression to a greater than 50% stenosis was 8%. When progression in all categories was considered, 60% of the sides showed some disease aggravation. The presence of or progression to a greater than 80% stenosis was highly correlated (p = 0.00001) with either the development of a total occlusion of the internal carotid artery or new symptoms. The major risk factors associated with disease progression were cigarette smoking, diabetes mellitus, and age. Those patients under 65 years of age were most likely to show progression. Despite high rates of disease progression, this study further supports the contention that it is prudent to follow a conservative course in the management of asymptomatic patients presenting with a cervical bruit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis
Mayberg, M. R. (1991) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03470230047029 · Cited by 964
Howard, G., Sharrett, A. R., Heiss, G., Evans, G. W., Chambless, L. E., Riley, W. A., & Burke, G. L. (1993) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.24.9.1297 · Cited by 724
Cell proliferation in human coronary arteries.
Gordon, D., Reidy, M. A., Benditt, E. P., & Schwartz, S. M. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4600 · Cited by 532
Risk of stroke in the distribution of an asymptomatic carotid artery
(1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90220-1 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Roederer, G. O., Langlois, Y. E., Jager, K. A., Primozich, J. F., Beach, K. W., Phillips, D. J., & Strandness, D. E.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 605-613
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2032312761
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The natural history of carotid arterial disease in asymptomatic patients with cervical bruits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.15.4.605
- The paper
- Roederer, G. O., Langlois, Y. E., Jager, K. A., Primozich, J. F., Beach, K. W., Phillips, D. J., & Strandness, D. E. (1984). The natural history of carotid arterial disease in asymptomatic patients with cervical bruits. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.15.4.605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.