The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial.
Abstract
In a randomized controlled trial we compared the clinical outcome of acute stroke patients, 110 of whom were allocated to treatment in a stroke unit and 110 to treatment in general medical wards. No significant difference existed between these groups with regard to sex, age, marital status, medical history, or functional impairment on admission. Outcome was measured at 6 and 52 weeks after the stroke by the proportion of patients at home, the proportion of patients in an institution, the mortality, and the functional state. After 6 weeks 56.4% of the patients randomized to the stroke unit and 32.7% of the patients randomized to the general medical wards were at home (p = 0.0004), and after 52 weeks 62.7% and 44.6%, respectively, were at home (p = 0.002). After 6 weeks 36.3% of the patients from the stroke unit and 50.0% from the general medical wards were in an institution (p = 0.02); after 52 weeks 12.7% and 22.7%, respectively, were institutionalized (p = 0.016). After 6 weeks mortality was 7.3% for the stroke unit group and 17.3% for the general medical wards group (p = 0.027). After 52 weeks mortality was 24.6% for the stroke unit group and 32.7% for the general medical wards group (difference not significant). Functional state was significantly better for patients treated in the stroke unit after both 6 and 52 weeks. We conclude that care of patients with acute stroke in a stroke unit improves clinical outcome compared with treatment in general medical wards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke
Collaboratio, S. U. T. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000197.pub2 · Cited by 1,314
Bernhardt (2004) · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000120727.40792.40 · Cited by 593
Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen stroke study
Jørgensen, H. S., Nakayama, H., Raaschou, H. O., Vive-Larsen, J., Støier, M., & Olsen, T. S. (1995) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80567-2 · Cited by 538
Treatment in a Combined Acute and Rehabilitation Stroke Unit: Which Aspects Are Most Important?
Indredavik, B., Bakke, F., Slørdahl, S. A., Rokseth, R., & Håheim, L. L. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.5.917 · Cited by 368
Self-citationLanghammer, B., & Stanghelle, J. K. (2000) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/0269215500cr338oa · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Indredavik, B., Bakke, F., Solberg, R., Rokseth, R., Haaheim, L. L., & Holme, I.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1026-1031
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2028555537
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.22.8.1026
- The paper
- Indredavik, B., Bakke, F., Solberg, R., Rokseth, R., Haaheim, L. L., & Holme, I. (1991). Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.22.8.1026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.