Cited by 303Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryMedical Practices and RehabilitationAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Bobath or Motor Relearning Programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study

Langhammer, Birgitta, Stanghelle, Johan K·2000·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: To examine whether two different physiotherapy regimes caused any differences in outcome in rehabilitation after acute stroke. Design: A double-blind study of patients with acute first-ever stroke. Sixty-one patients were consecutively included, block randomized into two groups, and stratified according to gender and hemiplegic site. Group 1 (33 patients) and group 2 (28 patients) had physiotherapy according to Motor Relearning Programme (MRP) and Bobath, respectively. The supplemental treatment did not differ in the two groups. Main outcome measures: The Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), the Sødring Motor Evaluation Scale (SMES), the Barthel ADL Index and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) were used. The following parameters were also registered: length of stay in the hospital, use of assistive devices for mobility, and the patient's accommodation after discharge from the hospital. Results: Patients treated according to MRP stayed fewer days in hospital than those treated according to Bobath (mean 21 days versus 34 days, p = 0.008). Both groups improved in MAS and SMES, but the improvement in motor function was significantly better in the MRP group. The two groups improved in Barthel ADL Index without significant differences between the groups. However, women treated by MRP improved more in ADL than women treated by Bobath. There were no differences between the groups in the life quality test (NHP), use of assistive devices or accommodation after discharge from the hospital. Conclusion: The present study indicates that physiotherapy treatment using the MRP is preferable to that using the Bobath programme in the acute rehabilitation of stroke patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1191/0269215500cr338oa

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bobath and Motor Relearning Programme differed in cost-effectiveness in terms of length of stay in hospital, with significantly shorter length of stay in favor of Motor Relearning Programme (21 versus 34 days, P=0.008).

    “One study 39 compared the cost-effectiveness in terms of length of stay in the hospital of Bobath and Motor Relearning Programme and observed a significantly shorter length of stay in the hospital in favor of the Motor Relearning Programme group (21 versus 34 days, Pϭ0.008).”
  • Only 7 studies in the review outlined the content of the Bobath Concept in more detail referring to specifically trained therapists who selected interventions from specifically designed treatment protocols.

    “There was a lack of description of the actual content of Bobath therapy; only 7 studies outlined the content of the Bobath Concept in more detail referring to specifically trained therapists, who selected interventions from specifically designed treatment protocols.39,43,46 -48,53,55”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langhammer, B., & Stanghelle, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Bærum Sykehus (NO)
  • Sunnaas sykehus (NO)
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2000-08
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
361-369
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2154009453
Cited by
303
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
15.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
stroke rehabilitation, Bobath therapy, physiotherapy, acute stroke, motor recovery, activities of daily living, length of hospital stay, gender differences, quality of life, hemiplegia
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hemiplegia, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Skills, Treatment Outcome, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review