The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characteristics of patent foramen ovale associated with cryptogenic stroke. A biplane transesophageal echocardiographic study.
Abstract
Patent foramen ovale is associated with ischemic stroke in patients without a clearly identifiable etiology for stroke (cryptogenic stroke). Paradoxical embolization is thought to be a potential mechanism. However, patent foramen ovale is also found in patients with known cause of stroke. Therefore, using contrast transesophageal echocardiography, we characterized the patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic stroke patients to assess morphological factors that may contribute to paradoxical embolization. Contrast transesophageal echocardiographic studies of 74 consecutive patients referred for ischemic stroke were reviewed. Twenty-three patients with patent foramen ovale were identified. These patients were classified as having strokes of determined origin or cryptogenic strokes according to criteria developed for the Stroke Data Bank of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Separation of septum primum from secundum and the number of microbubbles appearing in left atrium were then quantitated. These parameters were compared between patients with cryptogenic stroke and those with known cause of stroke. The patent foramen ovale dimension was significantly larger in patients with cryptogenic stroke compared with patients with an identifiable cause of stroke (2.1 +/- 1.7 mm versus 0.57 +/- 0.78 mm [mean +/- SD]; P < .01). The number of microbubbles was also greater in patients with cryptogenic stroke compared with patients with an identifiable cause of stroke (13.9 +/- 10.7 versus 1.6 +/- 0.8 [mean +/- SD]; P < .0005). Patients with cryptogenic stroke have larger patent foramen ovale with more extensive right-to-left interatrial shunting than patients with stroke of determined cause. Transesophageal echocardiographically identifiable characteristics of patent foramen ovale may be important in defining the clinical significance of individual patent foramina.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sacco, R. L., Adams, R., Albers, G., Alberts, M. J., Benavente, O., Furie, K., Goldstein, L. B., Gorelick, P., Halperin, J., Harbaugh, R., et al. (2006) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000199147.30016.74 · Cited by 1,873
Self-citationMas, J.-L., Arquizan, C., Lamy, C., Zuber, M., Cabanes, L., Derumeaux, G., & Coste, J. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011503 · Cited by 1,361
Interatrial septal abnormalities and stroke: A meta-analysis of case-control studies
Overell, J. R., Bone, I., & Lees, K. R. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.55.8.1172 · Cited by 936
Patent Foramen Ovale and Stroke
Homma, S., & Sacco, R. L. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.104.524371 · Cited by 435
Self-citationMorphological and Functional Characteristics of Patent Foramen Ovale and Their Embolic Implications
De Castro, S., Cartoni, D., Fiorelli, M., Rasura, M., Anzini, A., Zanette, E. M., Beccia, M., Colonnese, C., Fedele, F., Fieschi, C., et al. (2000) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.31.10.2407 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- Homma, S., Di Tullio, M. R., Sacco, R. L., Mihalatos, D., Li Mandri, G., & Mohr, J. P.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 582-586
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1997599767
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics of patent foramen ovale associated with cryptogenic stroke. A biplane transesophageal echocardiographic study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.25.3.582
- The paper
- Homma, S., Di Tullio, M. R., Sacco, R. L., Mihalatos, D., Li Mandri, G., & Mohr, J. P. (1994). Characteristics of patent foramen ovale associated with cryptogenic stroke. A biplane transesophageal echocardiographic study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.25.3.582
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.