Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Morphological and Functional Characteristics of Patent Foramen Ovale and Their Embolic Implications

De Castro, Stefano, Cartoni, Domenico, Fiorelli, Marco, Rasura, Maurizia, Anzini, Alexia, Zanette, Elietta M., Beccia, Mario, Colonnese, Claudio, Fedele, Francesco, Fieschi, Cesare, Pandian, Natesa G.·2000·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has detected a high prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in stroke patients, but the clinical implications of the distinctive characteristics of this patency are still a matter of debate. Methods —We studied 350 patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 1 week of admission. Of these, 101 (29%) were identified by contrast TEE to have a PFO; 86 patients (25%) were cryptogenic stroke patients, and 163 were excluded because of the presence of a definite or possible arterial or clinical evidence of a source of emboli or small-vessel disease. Thirteen PFO subjects without a history of embolism were designated as the control group. All PFO and cryptogenic stroke patients were followed up by neurological visits. Results —Compared with controls, PFO patients with acute stroke or TIA more frequently presented with a right-to-left shunt at rest and a higher membrane mobility ( P <0.05). Patients with these characteristics were considered to be at high risk. During a median follow-up period of 31 months (range, 4 to 58 months), 8 PFO and 18 cryptogenic stroke patients experienced recurrent cerebrovascular events. The cumulative estimate of risk of cerebrovascular event recurrence at 3 years was 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 10.2%) for “low-risk” PFO patients, 12.5% (95% CI, 0% to 26.1%) for “high-risk” PFO patients, and 16.3% (95% CI, 7.2% to 25.4%) for cryptogenic stroke patients (high-risk PFO versus low-risk PFO, P =0.05). Conclusions —The association of right-to-left shunting at rest and high membrane mobility, as detected by contrast TEE, seems to identify PFO patients with cerebrovascular ischemic events who are at higher risk for recurrent brain embolism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.31.10.2407

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
De Castro, S., Cartoni, D., Fiorelli, M., Rasura, M., Anzini, A., Zanette, E. M., Beccia, M., Colonnese, C., Fedele, F., Fieschi, C., & Pandian, N. G.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2000-10
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
2407-2413
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2089933125
Cited by
379
References
21
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Morphological and Functional Characteristics of Patent Foramen Ovale and Their Embolic Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.31.10.2407
The paper
De Castro, S., Cartoni, D., Fiorelli, M., Rasura, M., Anzini, A., Zanette, E. M., Beccia, M., Colonnese, C., Fedele, F., Fieschi, C., & Pandian, N. G. (2000). Morphological and Functional Characteristics of Patent Foramen Ovale and Their Embolic Implications. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.31.10.2407

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.