The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.
Open accessAbstract
This study was undertaken to elucidate whether and how age influences stroke outcome. This prospective and community-based study comprised 515 consecutive acute stroke patients. Computed tomographic scan was performed in 79% of patients. Activities of daily living (ADL) and neurological status were assessed weekly during hospital stay using the Barthel Index (BI) and the Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS), respectively. Information regarding social condition and comorbidity before stroke was also registered. A multiple regression model was used to analyze the independent influence of age on stroke outcome. Age was not related to the type of stroke lesion or infarct size. However, age independently influenced initial BI (-4 points per 10 years, P < .01), initial SSS (-2 points per 10 years, P = .01), and discharge BI (-3 points per 10 years, P < .01). No independent influence of age was found regarding mortality within 3 months, discharge SSS, length of hospital stay, and discharge placement. ADL improvement was influenced independently by age (-3 points per 10 years, P < .01), whereas age had no influence on neurological improvement or on speed of recovery. Age independently influences stroke outcome selectively in ADL-related aspects (BI) but not in neurological aspects (SSS), suggesting a poorer compensatory ability in elderly stroke patients. Therefore, rehabilitation of elderly stroke patients should be focused more on ADL and compensation rather than on the recovery of neurological status, and age itself should not be a selection criterion for rehabilitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gender Differences in Stroke Incidence and Poststroke Disability in the Framingham Heart Study
Petrea, R. E., Beiser, A. S., Seshadri, S., Kelly-Hayes, M., Kase, C. S., & Wolf, P. A. (2009) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.108.542894 · Cited by 672
PREP2: A biomarker‐based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke
Stinear, C. M., Byblow, W. D., Ackerley, S. J., Smith, M., Borges, V. M., & Barber, P. A. (2017) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.488 · Cited by 359
Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting
Ween, J. E., Alexander, M. P., D'Esposito, M., & Roberts, M. (1996) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.47.2.388 · Cited by 304
Paolucci, S., Antonucci, G., Grasso, M. G., Bragoni, M., Coiro, P., De Angelis, D., Fusco, F. R., Morelli, D., Venturiero, V., Troisi, E., et al. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000102902.39759.d3 · Cited by 283
Kreisel, S. H., Hennerici, M. G., & Bäzner, H. (2007) · Cerebrovascular Diseases · doi:10.1159/000098323 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakayama, H., Jørgensen, H. S., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 808-813
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2054203392
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.25.4.808
- The paper
- Nakayama, H., Jørgensen, H. S., Raaschou, H. O., & Olsen, T. S. (1994). The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.25.4.808
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.