The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Static and Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Measurements
Abstract
Background and Purpose Cerebral autoregulation can be evaluated by measuring relative blood flow changes in response to a steady-state change in the blood pressure (static method) or during the response to a rapid change in blood pressure (dynamic method). The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the two methods in humans with both intact and impaired autoregulatory capacity. Methods Using intraoperative transcranial Doppler sonography recordings from both middle cerebral arteries, we determined static and dynamic autoregulatory responses in 10 normal subjects undergoing elective surgical procedures. The changes in cerebrovascular resistance were estimated from the changes in cerebral blood flow velocity and arterial blood pressure in response to manipulations of blood pressure. Static autoregulation was determined by analyzing the response to a phenylephrine-induced rise in blood pressure, whereas rapid deflation of a blood pressure cuff around one thigh served as a stimulus for testing dynamic autoregulation. Both measurements were performed in patients with intact autoregulation during propofol anesthesia and again in the same patients after autoregulation had been impaired by administration of high-dose isoflurane. Results There was a significant reduction in autoregulatory capacity after the administration of high-dose isoflurane, which could be demonstrated using static ( P <.0001) and dynamic ( P <.0001) methods. The correlation between static or steady-state and dynamic autoregulation measurements was highly significant ( r =.93, P <.0001). Conclusions These data show that in normal human subjects measurement of dynamic autoregulation yields similar results as static testing of intact and pharmacologically impaired autoregulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
van Beek, A. H., Claassen, J. A., Rikkert, M. G. O., & Jansen, R. W. (2008) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2008.13 · Cited by 485
Syncope, cerebral perfusion, and oxygenation
Van Lieshout, J. J., Wieling, W., Karemaker, J. M., & Secher, N. H. (2003) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00260.2002 · Cited by 365
Cerebral blood flow during vasovagal syncope induced by active standing or head up tilt
Sung, R. Y. T. (2000) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.82.2.154 · Cited by 40
Horiuchi, M., Rossetti, G. M., & Oliver, S. J. (2022) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x20910053 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Tiecks, F. P., Lam, A. M., Aaslid, R., & Newell, D. W.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1014-1019
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2100436846
- Cited by
- 875
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Static and Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.26.6.1014
- The paper
- Tiecks, F. P., Lam, A. M., Aaslid, R., & Newell, D. W. (1995). Comparison of Static and Dynamic Cerebral Autoregulation Measurements. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.26.6.1014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.