The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical Blood Flow and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in a New Noncraniotomy Model of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the Rat
Abstract
Background and Purpose Acute cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a major cause of morbidity whose precise etiology is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and cortical blood flow during SAH using a new experimental model in the rat. Methods CPP (mean arterial pressure minus intracranial pressure), cortical laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF), and electroencephalogram were continuously recorded during and after SAH in 16 ventilated rats. SAH was produced by advancing an intraluminal suture from the external carotid artery through the internal carotid artery to perforate the vessel near its intracranial bifurcation. Results Eight rats (50%) died within 24 hours of SAH. In all rats, blood was widely distributed throughout the basal, convexity, and interhemispheric subarachnoid spaces and throughout the ventricular system. CPP decreased after SAH at an initial rate of 1.1±0.2 mm Hg/s, reaching its nadir 59±9 seconds after the onset of SAH. During the same period, LDF fell at a rate of 1.4±0.3%/s ( P =NS vs CPP). After reaching its nadir, CPP rose at a rate of 0.4±0.01 mm Hg/s, but LDF continued to fall at 0.2±0.03%/s ( P <.05 vs CPP) reaching a nadir of 21.7±2.5% significantly later than CPP (189.5±39 s after SAH, P <.05). No correlation was found between peak changes in CPP and LDF. Electroencephalogram activity followed the changes in LDF, reaching nadir values 289±55 seconds after SAH. Conclusions These findings demonstrate that although reduced CPP causes the initial decrease in cortical blood flow after SAH, secondary reductions occurring after CPP has reached its nadir are caused by other factors such as acute vasoconstriction. This noncraniotomy model of SAH in the rat has several advantages over existing models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology.
Moncada, S., Palmer, R. M., & Higgs, E. A. (1991) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(25)06663-3 · Cited by 15,525
Reversible middle cerebral artery occlusion without craniectomy in rats.
Longa, E. Z., Weinstein, P. R., Carlson, S., & Cummins, R. (1989) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.20.1.84 · Cited by 7,463
Bederson, J. B., Pitts, L. H., Tsuji, M., Nishimura, M. C., Davis, R. L., & Bartkowski, H. (1986) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.17.3.472 · Cited by 2,681
Self-citation
Cited by
Sugawara, T., Ayer, R., Jadhav, V., & Zhang, J. H. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.08.004 · Cited by 569
Suwatcharangkoon, S., Meyers, E., Falo, C., Schmidt, J. M., Agarwal, S., Claassen, J., & Mayer, S. A. (2016) · JAMA Neurology · doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3188 · Cited by 114
Liu, W., Li, R., Yin, J., Guo, S., Chen, Y., Fan, H., Li, G., Li, Z., Li, X., Zhang, X., et al. (2019) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-019-1396-5 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Bederson, J. B., Germano, I. M., & Guarino, L.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1086-1092
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2035242351
- Cited by
- 453
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.