Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimal Depth and Duration of Mild Hypothermia in a Focal Model of Transient Cerebral Ischemia: Effects on Neurologic Outcome, Infarct Size, Apoptosis, and Inflammation

Open access
Maier, Carolina M., Ahern, Kristine vB., Cheng, Ming L., Lee, Jong Eun, Yenari, Midori A., Steinberg, Gary K.·1998·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —Mild hypothermia is possibly the single most effective method of cerebroprotection developed to date. However, many questions regarding mild hypothermia remain to be addressed before its potential implementation in the treatment of human stroke. Here we report the results of 2 studies designed to determine the optimal depth and duration of mild hypothermia in focal stroke and its effects on infarct size, neurological outcome, programmed cell death, and inflammation. Methods —Rats underwent a 2-hour occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery. In the first study (I) animals were kept (intraischemically) at either 37°C (n=8), 33°C (n=8), or 30°C (n=8). Study II consisted of 4 groups: (1) controls (37°C, n=10), (2) 30 minutes of hypothermia started at ischemic onset (33°C, n=9), (3)1 hour (33°C, n=8), and (4) 2 hours (33°C, n=8). Brain temperature was measured by a thermocouple probe placed in the contralateral cortex. After suture removal, all animals were rewarmed and reperfused for 22 hours (I) or 70 hours (II). Results —Mild hypothermia to 33°C or 30°C was neuroprotective (17±7% and 27±6%, respectively) relative to controls (53±8%, P <0.02), but 33°C was better tolerated and recovery from anesthesia was faster. The neurological score of hypothermic animals was significantly better than that of controls (I & II) at both 24 and 72 hours postischemia except for the 30-minute group (II), which showed no improvement. In Study II, 2 hours of hypothermia reduced injury by 59%, 1 hour reduced injury by 84% whereas 30 minutes did not reduce injury. Normalized for infarct size, 2 hours of mild hypothermia decreased neutrophil accumulation by 57% whereas both 1 hour and 30 minutes had no effect. At 72 hours, 1 and 2 hours of mild hypothermia decreased transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining by 78% and 99%, respectively, and 30 minutes of hypothermia had no effect. Conclusions —Intraischemic mild hypothermia must be maintained for 1 to 2 hours to obtain optimal neuroprotection against ischemic cell death due to necrosis and apoptosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.29.10.2171

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Maier, C. M., Ahern, K. V., Cheng, M. L., Lee, J. E., Yenari, M. A., & Steinberg, G. K.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1998-10
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
2171-2180
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2131150967
Cited by
321
References
0
FWCI
8.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Depth and Duration of Mild Hypothermia in a Focal Model of Transient Cerebral Ischemia: Effects on Neurologic Outcome, Infarct Size, Apoptosis, and Inflammation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.29.10.2171
The paper
Maier, C. M., Ahern, K. V., Cheng, M. L., Lee, J. E., Yenari, M. A., & Steinberg, G. K. (1998). Optimal Depth and Duration of Mild Hypothermia in a Focal Model of Transient Cerebral Ischemia: Effects on Neurologic Outcome, Infarct Size, Apoptosis, and Inflammation. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.10.2171

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.