Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Burden of Caregiving in Partners of Long-Term Stroke Survivors

Reimer, W. J. M. Scholte op, de Haan, R. J., Rijnders, P. T., Limburg, M., van den Bos, G. A. M.·1998·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —Few data are available on the specific caregiving-related problems of stroke patients’ caregivers and factors that influence the burden of these caregivers. The aim of this study was to describe the level and specific nature of the burden of caregiving as experienced by stroke patients’ partners and to estimate the relative contribution of patient and partner characteristics to the presence of partners’ burden. Methods —As part of a multicenter study on quality of care, burden of caregiving was assessed in 115 partners at 3 years after stroke. Explanatory factors of burden were studied in terms of (1) characteristics of patients (sociodemographic status, severity, type, and localization of stroke, disability, handicap, and unmet care demands) and (2) characteristics of partners (age, sex, disability, quality of life, loneliness, amount of care provided, and unmet care demands). Results —Partners of stroke patients perceived most caregiving burden in terms of feelings of heavy responsibility, uncertainty about patients’ care needs, constant worries, restraints in social life, and feelings that patients rely on only their care. Multiple regression analysis revealed that a higher level of burden could partly be explained by patients’ disability ( R 2 =14%), but primarily by partners’ characteristics in terms of emotional distress ( R 2 =16%), loneliness ( R 2 =6%), disability ( R 2 =3%), amount of informal care provided ( R 2 =2%), unmet demands for psychosocial care ( R 2 =4%), and unmet demands for assistance in activities of daily living ( R 2 =2%). Conclusions —Higher levels of burden are primarily related to partners’ emotional distress and less to the amount of care they provided, or to patients’ characteristics. Sharing responsibilities, helping to clarify the patients’ needs, and getting occasional relief of caregiving may be important in the support of caregivers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.29.8.1605

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Reimer, W. J. M. S. O., de Haan, R. J., Rijnders, P. T., Limburg, M., & van den Bos, G. A. M.
Venue
Stroke
Published
1998-08
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1605-1611
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2136296621
Cited by
273
References
4
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Burden of Caregiving in Partners of Long-Term Stroke Survivors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.29.8.1605
The paper
Reimer, W. J. M. S. O., de Haan, R. J., Rijnders, P. T., Limburg, M., & van den Bos, G. A. M. (1998). The Burden of Caregiving in Partners of Long-Term Stroke Survivors. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.8.1605

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.