The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Burden of Caregiving in Partners of Long-Term Stroke Survivors
Abstract
Background and Purpose —Few data are available on the specific caregiving-related problems of stroke patients’ caregivers and factors that influence the burden of these caregivers. The aim of this study was to describe the level and specific nature of the burden of caregiving as experienced by stroke patients’ partners and to estimate the relative contribution of patient and partner characteristics to the presence of partners’ burden. Methods —As part of a multicenter study on quality of care, burden of caregiving was assessed in 115 partners at 3 years after stroke. Explanatory factors of burden were studied in terms of (1) characteristics of patients (sociodemographic status, severity, type, and localization of stroke, disability, handicap, and unmet care demands) and (2) characteristics of partners (age, sex, disability, quality of life, loneliness, amount of care provided, and unmet care demands). Results —Partners of stroke patients perceived most caregiving burden in terms of feelings of heavy responsibility, uncertainty about patients’ care needs, constant worries, restraints in social life, and feelings that patients rely on only their care. Multiple regression analysis revealed that a higher level of burden could partly be explained by patients’ disability ( R 2 =14%), but primarily by partners’ characteristics in terms of emotional distress ( R 2 =16%), loneliness ( R 2 =6%), disability ( R 2 =3%), amount of informal care provided ( R 2 =2%), unmet demands for psychosocial care ( R 2 =4%), and unmet demands for assistance in activities of daily living ( R 2 =2%). Conclusions —Higher levels of burden are primarily related to partners’ emotional distress and less to the amount of care they provided, or to patients’ characteristics. Sharing responsibilities, helping to clarify the patients’ needs, and getting occasional relief of caregiving may be important in the support of caregivers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients
van Swieten, J. C., Koudstaal, P. J., Visser, M. C., Schouten, H. J., & van Gijn, J. (1988) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 · Cited by 6,512
The Development of a Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale
de Jong-Gierveld, J., & Kamphuls, F. (1985) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168500900307 · Cited by 1,291
Families Caring for Elders in Residence: Issues in the Measurement of Burden
Poulshock, S. W., & Deimling, G. T. (1984) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/39.2.230 · Cited by 582 · cited 1×
“It has been assumed that partners who provide more care (objective burden) will experience a higher amount of burden (subjective burden).(33,34) Although “the consequences of involvement in care for the personal life of the caregiver” (subscale 3) was primarily explained by the actual amount of care provided, we could…”
BackgroundSeven chronic conditions: their impact on US adults' activity levels and use of medical services
Verbrugge, L. M., & Patrick, D. L. (1995) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.85.2.173 · Cited by 356 · cited 5×
“(26,27)The SCQ is arranged into 3 subscales: (1) satisfaction with the impaired person as a recipient of care (7 items); (2) satisfaction with one’s own performance as a caregiver (12 items); and (3) consequences of involvement in care for the personal life of the caregiver (8 items).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Smith, K. P., & Christakis, N. A. (2008) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134601 · Cited by 1,638
Mortality after the Hospitalization of a Spouse
Christakis, N. A., & Allison, P. D. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa050196 · Cited by 501
Training carers of stroke patients: randomised controlled trial
Kalra, L., Evans, A., Perez, I., Melbourn, A., Patel, A., Knapp, M., & Donaldson, N. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7448.1099 · Cited by 445
Caregiver burden and health-related quality of life among Japanese stroke caregivers
Morimoto, T. (2003) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/32.2.218 · Cited by 300
Schreiner, A. S., Morimoto, T., Arai, Y., & Zarit, S. (2006) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860500312142 · Cited by 254
Metadata
- Authors
- Reimer, W. J. M. S. O., de Haan, R. J., Rijnders, P. T., Limburg, M., & van den Bos, G. A. M.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1605-1611
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2136296621
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Burden of Caregiving in Partners of Long-Term Stroke Survivors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.29.8.1605
- The paper
- Reimer, W. J. M. S. O., de Haan, R. J., Rijnders, P. T., Limburg, M., & van den Bos, G. A. M. (1998). The Burden of Caregiving in Partners of Long-Term Stroke Survivors. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.8.1605
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.