Cited by 254Nursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Assessing family caregiver's mental health using a statistically derived cut-off score for the Zarit Burden Interview

Schreiner, A. S., Morimoto, T., Arai, Y., Zarit, S.·2006·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

Decades of research have confirmed that being a family caregiver is a stressful role. However, the point at which these stressors constitute a real risk for decreased mental health has not been established. The purpose of the present study was to determine a statistically valid cut-off score for the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) in order to identify family caregivers at risk for depression and in need of further assessment and intervention. The ZBI and the Geriatric Depression Scale or the CES-D were administered to three different populations of family caregivers of older adults: stroke caregivers (n=80), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) caregivers (n=48), and general disability caregivers (n=70). Using three different statistical methods, a ZBI cut-off score was determined. Next, contingency analysis was used to compare depression scale scores and ZBI cut-offs for the three groups of caregivers. Findings suggest that a cut-off score ranging from 24-26 has significant predictive validity for identifying caregivers at risk for depression. A ZBI cut-off of 24 correctly identified 72% of caregivers with probable depression. The validity of ZBI cut-offs scores warrants further confirmation with larger samples. Valid cut-off scores would enable health care providers to assess family caregivers at risk and provide necessary interventions to improve their quality of life in this important role.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607860500312142

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The carers' profile in our sample did not differ significantly from that in earlier studies in Lebanon and elsewhere.

    “The carers’ profile in our sample did not differ significantly from that in earlier studies in Lebanon and elsewhere (Schreiner et al, 2006; Papastavrou et al, 2007)”

    From Dementia and family burden of care in Lebanon (2017) · cites this paper as Schreiner et al, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schreiner, A. S., Morimoto, T., Arai, Y., & Zarit, S.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Nara Medical University (JP)
  • c National Institute for Longevity Sciences , Japan
Corresponding author
Schreiner, A. S.
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2006-03-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
107-111
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2159528333
Cited by
254
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
15.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
family caregivers, Zarit Burden Interview, caregiver burden, cut-off values, depression screening, caregiver mental health, stroke caregivers, Geriatric Depression Scale, CES-D, predictive validity
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Japan, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Caregivers, Stroke, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review