Cited by 402Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Plasticity of Language-Related Brain Function During Recovery From Stroke

Open access
Thulborn, Keith R., Carpenter, Patricia A., Just, Marcel A.·1999·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —This study was undertaken to correlate functional recovery from aphasia after acute stroke with the temporal evolution of the anatomic, physiological, and functional changes as measured by MRI. Methods —Blood oxygenation level–dependent contrast and echo-planar MRI were used to map language comprehension in 6 normal adults and in 2 adult patients during recovery from acute stroke presenting with aphasia. Perfusion, diffusion, sodium, and conventional anatomic MRI were used to follow physiological and structural changes. Results —The normal activation pattern for language comprehension showed activation predominately in left-sided Wernicke’s and Broca’s areas, with laterality ratios of 0.8 and 0.3, respectively. Recovery of the patient confirmed as having a completed stroke affecting Broca’s area occurred rapidly with a shift of activation to the homologous region in the right hemisphere within 3 days, with continued rightward lateralization over 6 months. In the second patient, in whom mapping was performed fortuitously before stroke, recovery of a Wernicke’s aphasia showed a similar increasing rightward shift in activation recruitment over 9 months after the event. Conclusions —Recovery of aphasia in adults can occur rapidly and is concomitant with an activation pattern that changes from left to a homologous right hemispheric pattern. Such recovery occurs even when the stroke evolves to completion. Such plasticity must be considered when evaluating stroke interventions based on behavioral and neurological measurements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.30.4.749

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research on recovery of function after brain injury has shown that, in the face of left hemisphere damage, the right hemisphere can increase its activity in a compensatory manner.

    “Previous research on recovery of function after brain injury has shown that, in the face of left hemisphere damage, the right hemisphere can increase its activity in a compensatory manner (16–18).”
  • The results are consistent with studies of recovery of function after left hemisphere damage showing increased activity in right hemisphere homologues of left hemisphere language areas associated with improved language ability.

    “These results are consistent with studies of recovery of function after left hemisphere damage that have shown increased activity in right hemisphere homologues of left hemisphere language areas associated with improved language ability (16–18).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Frackowiak RS, Friston KJ, Frith CD, Dolan RJ, Mazziotta JC. The cerebral basis of functional recovery. In: Human Brain Function. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 1997:275-299.
  2. Ogawa S, Tank DW, Menon RS, Ellerman JM, Kim SG, Merkle H, Ugurbil K. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping using MRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992; 89:5951-5955.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thulborn, K. R., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Venue
Stroke
Published
1999-04
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
749-754
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2032187014
Cited by
402
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 14
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Stroke (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository (submittedVersion)
  • KiltHub Repository
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca063661-03)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 00661)
  • National Cancer Institute (PHS-RO1-CA63661)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (PHS-PO1-NS35949, P01NS035949)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
aphasia, stroke recovery, neuroplasticity, language comprehension, hemispheric lateralization, Wernicke's area, Broca's area, right hemisphere activation, functional MRI, perfusion MRI, diffusion MRI, sodium MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Aphasia, Wernicke, Cerebral Infarction, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Language, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuronal Plasticity, Reading, Temporal Lobe, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review