The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diffusion MRI in Patients With Transient Ischemic Attacks
Open accessAbstract
Background and Purpose —Diffusion MRI has established value in patients with ischemic stroke but has not been systematically investigated in patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA). Methods —Clinical, conventional MRI, and diffusion MRI data were collected on 42 consecutive patients with symptoms of cerebral TIA. TIA imaging data were compared with those from a contemporaneous group of 23 completed stroke patients. Results —Twenty of the 42 TIA patients (48%) demonstrated neuroanatomically relevant focal abnormalities on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) imaging. When present, DWI/ADC signal changes in TIA patients were less pronounced and smaller in volume than those in completed stroke patients. TIA symptom duration was significantly longer for DWI-positive than for DWI-negative patients, 7.3 versus 3.2 hours. Diffusion MRI information changed the suspected anatomic and vascular TIA localization and the suspected etiologic mechanism in over one third of patients with diffusion MRI abnormalities. Of the 20 TIA patients with identifiable lesions on diffusion MRI, 9 had follow-up imaging studies; of these, 4 did not show a relevant infarct on follow-up imaging. Conclusions —Diffusion MRI demonstrates ischemic abnormalities in nearly half of clinically defined TIA patients. The percentage of patients with a DWI lesion increases with increasing total symptom duration. In nearly half, the diffusion MRI changes may be fully reversible, while in the remainder the diffusion MRI findings herald the development of a parenchymal infarct despite transient clinical symptoms. Finally, diffusion imaging results have significant clinical utility, frequently changing the presumed localization and etiologic mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Savitz, S. I., & Caplan, L. R. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra041544 · Cited by 485
Johnston, S. C. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp020891 · Cited by 207
Lampinen, B., Szczepankiewicz, F., Mårtensson, J., van Westen, D., Sundgren, P. C., & Nilsson, M. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.053 · Cited by 200
Merino, J. G., & Warach, S. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.129 · Cited by 152
Ellingson, B. M. (2015) · Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s11910-014-0506-0 · Cited by 132
Richardson, S., Siow, B., Panagiotaki, E., Schneider, T., Lythgoe, M. F., & Alexander, D. C. (2014) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.25012 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Kidwell, C. S., Alger, J. R., Di Salle, F., Starkman, S., Villablanca, P., Bentson, J., & Saver, J. L.
- Venue
- Stroke
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1174-1180
- ISSN
- 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4628
- OpenAlex
- W1971313531
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.