Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting Tissue Outcome in Acute Human Cerebral Ischemia Using Combined Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted MR Imaging

Open access
Wu, Ona, Koroshetz, Walter J., Østergaard, Leif, Buonanno, Ferdinando S., Copen, William A., Gonzalez, R. Gilberto, Rordorf, Guy, Rosen, Bruce R., Schwamm, Lee H., Weisskoff, Robert M., Sorensen, A. Gregory·2001·Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose —Tissue signatures from acute MR imaging of the brain may be able to categorize physiological status and thereby assist clinical decision making. We designed and analyzed statistical algorithms to evaluate the risk of infarction for each voxel of tissue using acute human functional MRI. Methods —Diffusion-weighted MR images (DWI) and perfusion-weighted MR images (PWI) from acute stroke patients scanned within 12 hours of symptom onset were retrospectively studied and used to develop thresholding and generalized linear model (GLM) algorithms predicting tissue outcome as determined by follow-up MRI. The performances of the algorithms were evaluated for each patient by using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results —At their optimal operating points, thresholding algorithms combining DWI and PWI provided 66% sensitivity and 83% specificity, and GLM algorithms combining DWI and PWI predicted with 66% sensitivity and 84% specificity voxels that proceeded to infarct. Thresholding algorithms that combined DWI and PWI provided significant improvement to algorithms that utilized DWI alone ( P =0.02) but no significant improvement over algorithms utilizing PWI alone ( P =0.21). GLM algorithms that combined DWI and PWI showed significant improvement over algorithms that used only DWI ( P =0.02) or PWI ( P =0.04). The performances of thresholding and GLM algorithms were comparable ( P >0.2). Conclusions —Algorithms that combine acute DWI and PWI can assess the risk of infarction with higher specificity and sensitivity than algorithms that use DWI or PWI individually. Methods for quantitatively assessing the risk of infarction on a voxel-by-voxel basis show promise as techniques for investigating the natural spatial evolution of ischemic damage in humans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.str.32.4.933

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Wu, O., Koroshetz, W. J., Østergaard, L., Buonanno, F. S., Copen, W. A., Gonzalez, R. G., Rordorf, G., Rosen, B. R., Schwamm, L. H., Weisskoff, R. M., & Sorensen, A. G.
Venue
Stroke
Published
2001-04
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
933-942
ISSN
  • 0039-2499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4628
OpenAlex
W2009049939
Cited by
259
References
47
FWCI
14.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting Tissue Outcome in Acute Human Cerebral Ischemia Using Combined Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted MR Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.str.32.4.933
The paper
Wu, O., Koroshetz, W. J., Østergaard, L., Buonanno, F. S., Copen, W. A., Gonzalez, R. G., Rordorf, G., Rosen, B. R., Schwamm, L. H., Weisskoff, R. M., & Sorensen, A. G. (2001). Predicting Tissue Outcome in Acute Human Cerebral Ischemia Using Combined Diffusion- and Perfusion-Weighted MR Imaging. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.4.933

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.