The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome-Wide Association Study and Identification of a Protective Missense Variant on Lipoprotein(a) Concentration: Protective Missense Variant on Lipoprotein(a) Concentration—Brief Report
Abstract
Objective: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) but also to LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol. The genetic architecture of Lp(a) remains incompletely understood, as well as its independence of LDL cholesterol in its association to CAD. We investigated the genetic determinants of Lp(a) concentrations in a large prospective multiethnic cohort. We tested the association for potential causality between genetically determined higher Lp(a) concentrations and CAD using a multivariable Mendelian randomization strategy. Approach and Results: We studied 371 212 participants of the UK Biobank with available Lp(a) and genome-wide genetic data. Genome-wide association analyses confirmed 2 known and identified 37 novel loci ( P <5×10 −8 ) associated with Lp(a). Testing these loci as instrumental variables in an independent cohort with 60 801 cases and 123 504 controls, each SD genetically elevated Lp(a) conferred a 1.30 ([95% CI, 1.20–1.41] P =5.53×10 − 11 ) higher odds of CAD. Importantly, this association was independent of LDL cholesterol. Genetic fine-mapping in the LPA gene region identified 15 potential causal variants. This included a rare missense variant (rs41267813[A]) associated with lower Lp(a) concentration. We observed a strong interaction between rs41267813 and rs10455872 on Lp(a) concentrations, indicating a protective effect of rs41267813(A). Conclusions: This study supports an LDL cholesterol–independent causal link between Lp(a) and CAD. A rare missense variant in the LPA gene locus appears to be protective in people with the Lp(a) increasing variant of rs10455872. In the search for therapeutic targets of Lp(a), future work should focus on understanding the functional consequences of this missense variant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent GWAS of 371,212 individuals in the UK Biobank did find an association between Lp(a) levels and common variants at the LDLR locus.
“Multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS) did not find an association between Lp(a) levels and common variants at the LDLR locus10,46,47, but a recent GWAS of 371,212 individuals in the UK Biobank did48.”
From Functional interrogation of cellular Lp(a) uptake by genome-scale CRISPR screening (2025) · cites this paper as [48]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Verbanck, M., Chen, C.-Y., Neale, B., & Do, R. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0099-7 · Cited by 8,591
Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians
Davies, N. M., Holmes, M. V., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k601 · Cited by 4,404
Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption
Hartwig, F. P., Davey Smith, G., & Bowden, J. (2017) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyx102 · Cited by 3,485
A comprehensive 1000 Genomes–based genome-wide association meta-analysis of coronary artery disease
the CARDIoGRAMplusC4D Consortium (2015) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3396 · Cited by 2,447
Detecting pleiotropy in Mendelian randomisation studies with summary data and a continuous outcome
Greco M, F. D., Minelli, C., Sheehan, N. A., & Thompson, J. R. (2015) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6522 · Cited by 1,700
Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies
Hemani, G., Bowden, J., & Davey Smith, G. (2018) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddy163 · Cited by 1,496
Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors
Palmer, T. M., Lawlor, D. A., Harbord, R. M., Sheehan, N. A., Tobias, J. H., Timpson, N. J., Smith, G. D., & Sterne, J. A. (2012) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/0962280210394459 · Cited by 1,289
A Test in Context: Lipoprotein(a)
Tsimikas, S. (2017) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.042 · Cited by 1,137
Lipoprotein(a): resurrected by genetics
Kronenberg, F., & Utermann, G. (2013) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2012.02592.x · Cited by 521
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1001/jama.2009.1063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa0902604 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1470 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-018-04668-w · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30088-8 · DOI
- 10.1194/jlr.M076232 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/jhg.2015.107 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031356 · DOI
- 10.1210/clinem/dgz111 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2853-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-018-0579-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ng.3190 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkj144 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang G Sarkar A Carbonetto P Stephens M. A simple new approach to variable selection in regression with application to genetic fine-mapping. BioRxiv. 2018. · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.08.012 · DOI
- 10.1093/ije/dyw220 · DOI
- 10.1002/sim.7221 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/ije/dyy262 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.10.018 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41588-018-0222-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncomms7065 · DOI
- 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy311 · DOI
- 10.1093/hmg/ddu731 · DOI
- 10.1194/jlr.R067314 · DOI
- 10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002772 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11789-019-00093-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.04.015 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41576-018-0016-z · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Functional interrogation of cellular Lp(a) uptake by genome-scale CRISPR screening
Khan, T. G., Bragazzi Cunha, J., Raut, C., Burroughs, M., Vyas, H. S., Leix, K., Goonewardena, S. N., Smrcka, A. V., Speliotes, E. K., & Emmer, B. T. (2025) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.119174 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Said, M. A., Yeung, M. W., van de Vegte, Y. J., Benjamins, J. W., Dullaart, R. P. F., Ruotsalainen, S., Ripatti, S., Natarajan, P., Juarez-Orozco, L. E., Verweij, N., & van der Harst, P.
- Affiliations
- Department of Cardiology (M.A.S., M.W.Y., Y.J.v.d.V., J.W.B., L.E.J.-O., N.V., P.v.d.H.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
- Department of Endocrinology (R.P.F.D.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland HiLIFE (S. Ruotsalainen, S. Ripatti), University of Helsinki, Finland.
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA (S. Ripatti, P.N.).
- ORCID
- Venue
- Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
- Published
- 2021-05-05
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1792-1800
- ISSN
- 1079-5642
- 1524-4636
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 9
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review