Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Under Therapeutic Warfarin Reduces Periprocedural Complications: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis

Open access
Santangeli, Pasquale, Di Biase, Luigi, Horton, Rodney, Burkhardt, J. David, Sanchez, Javier, Al-Ahmad, Amin, Hongo, Richard, Beheiry, Salwa, Bai, Rong, Mohanty, Prasant, Lewis, William R., Natale, Andrea·2012·Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Abstract

Background—: Observational data suggest that performing radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) under therapeutic warfarin (continuous warfarin [CW]) may reduce the periprocedural risk of complications, such as thromboembolic events, compared to warfarin discontinuation (DW) with periprocedural bridging with heparin. We systematically reviewed the available evidence on the impact of CW compared with DW on periprocedural complications of AF catheter ablation. Methods and Results—: We searched major Web databases for studies on radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF under CW versus DW with periprocedural bridging with heparin. Data on periprocedural complications were extracted. We identified 9 studies (1 large case series indirectly compared with the latest Worldwide Survey). A total of 27 402 patients were included in the analysis (6400 undergoing ablation with CW). CW was associated with a striking decrease of thromboembolic complications (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.05–0.23; P <0.001) and minor bleeding complications (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.21–0.71; P =0.002) compared with DW. CW also did not increase the risk of major bleeding (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.31–1.43; P =0.30), including cardiac tamponade (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.19–2.47; P =0.57). Conclusions—: There is highly consistent evidence from observational studies that a CW strategy during radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF reduces the risk of thromboembolic complications without increasing the risk of bleeding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circep.111.964916

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
Santangeli, P., Di Biase, L., Horton, R., Burkhardt, J. D., Sanchez, J., Al-Ahmad, A., Hongo, R., Beheiry, S., Bai, R., Mohanty, P., Lewis, W. R., & Natale, A.
Venue
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Published
2012-04
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
302-311
ISSN
  • 1941-3084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3149
OpenAlex
W2546819700
Cited by
173
References
2
FWCI
15.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Under Therapeutic Warfarin Reduces Periprocedural Complications: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circep.111.964916
The paper
Santangeli, P., Di Biase, L., Horton, R., Burkhardt, J. D., Sanchez, J., Al-Ahmad, A., Hongo, R., Beheiry, S., Bai, R., Mohanty, P., Lewis, W. R., & Natale, A. (2012). Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Under Therapeutic Warfarin Reduces Periprocedural Complications: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.111.964916

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.