Cited by 114Genomics and Rare DiseasesCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Variant Interpretation for Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Refinement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/ClinGen Guidelines for the DCM Precision Medicine Study

Open access
Morales, Ana, Kinnamon, Daniel D., Jordan, Elizabeth, Platt, Julia, Vatta, Matteo, Dorschner, Michael O., Starkey, Carl A., Mead, Jonathan O. +62 more·2020·Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine

Abstract

Background: The hypothesis of the Dilated Cardiomyopathy Precision Medicine Study is that most dilated cardiomyopathy has a genetic basis. The study returns results to probands and, when indicated, to relatives. While both the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology and ClinGen’s MYH7 -cardiomyopathy specifications provide relevant guidance for variant interpretation, further gene- and disease-specific considerations were required for dilated cardiomyopathy. To this end, we tailored the ClinGen MYH7 -cardiomyopathy variant interpretation framework; the specifications implemented for the study are presented here. Methods: Modifications were created and approved by an external Variant Adjudication Oversight Committee. After a pilot using 81 probands, further adjustments were made, resulting in 27 criteria (9 modifications of the ClinGen MYH7 framework and reintroduction of 2 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association of Molecular Pathology criteria that were deemed not applicable by the ClinGen MYH7 working group). Results: These criteria were applied to 2059 variants in a test set of 97 probands. Variants were classified as benign (n=1702), likely benign (n=33), uncertain significance (n=71), likely pathogenic (likely pathogenic; n=12), and pathogenic (P; n=3). Only 2/15 likely pathogenic/P variants were identified in Non-Hispanic African ancestry probands. Conclusions: We tailored the ClinGen MYH7 criteria for our study. Our preliminary data show that 15/97 (15.5%) probands have likely pathogenic/P variants, most of which were identified in probands of Non-Hispanic European ancestry. We anticipate continued evolution of our approach, one that will be informed by new insights on variant interpretation and a greater understanding of the genetic architecture of dilated cardiomyopathy. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03037632

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circgen.119.002480

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morales, A., Kinnamon, D. D., Jordan, E., Platt, J., Vatta, M., Dorschner, M. O., Starkey, C. A., Mead, J. O., Ai, T., Burke, W., Gastier-Foster, J., Jarvik, G. P., Rehm, H. L., Nickerson, D. A., Hershberger, R. E., on behalf of the DCM Precision Medicine study of the DCM Consortium, Bowen, D. J., Haas, G., Abraham, W. T., Binkley, P. F., Hasan, A., Host, J., Lampert, B., Smith, S., Huggins, G. S., DeNofrio, D. D., Kiernan, M., Fishbein, D., Cheng, R., Dardas, T., Levy, W., Mahr, C., Masri, S., Stempien-Otero, A., Gottlieb (Ste Pl), S. S., Wheeler, M., Ashley, E., Hofmeyer, M., Tang, W. H. W., Starling, R., Owens, A., Marguilies, K. B., Cappola, T., Goldberg, L. R., McLean, R., Moore, C. K., Long, R. C., Jimenez Carcamo, J., Trachtenberg, B., Ashrith, G., Bhimarahj, A., Sweitzer, N. K., Shah, P., Lowes, B., Stoller, D., Smart, F., Morris, A. A., Wilcox, J., Pan, S., Ewald, G. A., Aaronson, K. D., Wang, J. J., Pamboukian, S., Judge, D. P., Kransdorf, E. P., Garg, S., Desvigne- Nickens, P., Troendle, J., Fu, Y.-P., & Hindorff, L.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Invitae (United States) (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Institute for Genomic Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH (J.G.-F.).
  • Broad Institute (US)
Venue
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Published
2020-04
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
e002480-e002480
ISSN
2574-8300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3018268201
Cited by
114
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Ohio State University
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18K08900)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL128857)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
dilated cardiomyopathy, variant interpretation, MYH7, ACMG/AMP criteria, genetic ancestry, pathogenic variant classification, precision medicine, genetic testing
MeSH terms
Cardiomyopathy, Dilated, Genetic Testing, Genetics, Medical, Humans, Mutation, United States, Genetic Variation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genomics, Precision Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review