The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Prevalence of Occult Pulmonary Venous Hypertension Revealed by Fluid Challenge in Pulmonary Hypertension
Open accessAbstract
Background—: Determining the cause for pulmonary hypertension is difficult in many patients. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is differentiated from pulmonary venous hypertension (PVH) by a wedge pressure (PWP) >15 mm Hg in PVH. Patients undergoing right heart catheterization for evaluation of pulmonary hypertension may be dehydrated and have reduced intravascular volume, potentially leading to a falsely low measurement of PWP and an erroneous diagnosis of PAH. We hypothesized that a fluid challenge during right heart catheterization would identify occult pulmonary venous hypertension (OPVH). Methods and Results—: We reviewed the results of patients undergoing fluid challenge in our pulmonary hypertension database from 2004 to 2011. Baseline hemodynamics were obtained and repeated after infusion of 0.5 L of normal saline for 5 to 10 minutes. Patients were categorized as OPVH if PWP increased to >15 mm Hg after fluid challenge. Baseline hemodynamics in 207 patients met criteria for PAH. After fluid challenge, 46 patients (22.2%) developed a PWP >15 mm Hg and were reclassified as OPVH. Patients with OPVH had a greater increase in PWP compared with patients with PAH, P <0.001, and their demographics and comorbid illnesses were similar to patients with PVH. There were no adverse events related to fluid challenge. Conclusions—: Fluid challenge at the time of right heart catheterization is easily performed, safe, and identifies a large group of patients diagnosed initially with PAH, but for whom OPVH contributes to pulmonary hypertension. These results have implications for therapeutic trials in PAH and support the routine use of fluid challenge during right heart catheterization in patients with risk factors for PVH.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension
Simonneau, G., Gatzoulis, M. A., Adatia, I., Celermajer, D., Denton, C., Ghofrani, A., Gomez Sanchez, M. A., Krishna Kumar, R., Landzberg, M., Machado, R. F., et al. (2013) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.029 · Cited by 4,191
Self-citation
Cited by
2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension
Galiè, N., Humbert, M., Vachiery, J.-L., Gibbs, S., Lang, I., Torbicki, A., Simonneau, G., Peacock, A., Vonk Noordegraaf, A., Beghetti, M., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317 · Cited by 6,931
Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease
Vachiéry, J.-L., Tedford, R. J., Rosenkranz, S., Palazzini, M., Lang, I., Guazzi, M., Coghlan, G., Chazova, I., & De Marco, T. (2019) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.01897-2018 · Cited by 555
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Mechanisms, Clinical Features, and Therapies
Sharma, K., & Kass, D. A. (2014) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.115.302922 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Robbins, I. M., Hemnes, A. R., Pugh, M. E., Brittain, E. L., Zhao, D. X., Piana, R. N., Fong, P. P., & Newman, J. H.
- Venue
- Circulation: Heart Failure
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116-122
- ISSN
- 1941-3289 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-3297
- OpenAlex
- W2148723902
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Prevalence of Occult Pulmonary Venous Hypertension Revealed by Fluid Challenge in Pulmonary Hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circheartfailure.113.000468
- The paper
- Robbins, I. M., Hemnes, A. R., Pugh, M. E., Brittain, E. L., Zhao, D. X., Piana, R. N., Fong, P. P., & Newman, J. H. (2014). High Prevalence of Occult Pulmonary Venous Hypertension Revealed by Fluid Challenge in Pulmonary Hypertension. Circulation: Heart Failure. https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.113.000468
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.