Cited by 29Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsHeart rate and cardiovascular health

Comparison of Outcome Adjudication by Investigators and by a Central End Point Committee in Heart Failure Trials: Experience of the SHIFT Heart Failure Study

Open access
Tyl, Benoît, Lopez Sendon, José, Borer, Jeffrey S., Lopez De Sa, Esteban, Lerebours, Guy, Varin, Claire, De Montigny, Aurélie, Pannaux, Matthieu +1 more·2020·Circulation: Heart Failure

Abstract

Background: The usefulness of adjudication by central end point committees (CECs) is poorly assessed in heart failure (HF) trials. We aimed to assess its impact on the outcome of the SHIFT trial (Systolic HF Treatment With the If Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial). Methods: SHIFT was a randomized placebo-controlled trial investigating the effect of ivabradine in 6505 HF patients with reduced ejection fraction. Prespecified end points, reported by investigators (all cardiologists) using specific case report form pages, included all-cause and specific causes of deaths and hospitalizations. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular deaths or hospitalizations for worsening HF. We compared the adjudication of prespecified end points made by investigators and by the CEC. Results: Investigators identified 7529 prespecified end points, 6793 of which were confirmed by the CEC: 98.1% of cardiovascular deaths, 88.6% of all hospitalizations, and 84.4% of hospitalizations for worsening HF. These differences had no meaningful impact on the study results; hazard ratio for the primary composite end point: investigators, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.76–0.91) versus CEC, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75–0.90), with similar results for each component of the primary end point (hazard ratio of 0.92 versus 0.91 for cardiovascular death and 0.78 versus 0.74 for hospitalization for worsening HF). Conclusions: Central adjudication by a CEC in the SHIFT study confirmed most of cardiovascular deaths and worsening HF hospitalizations assessed by cardiologists and did not result in a significant change of the final result as compared to investigator judgment. In this context, the benefits of CEC in blinded HF trials should be reconsidered. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT02441218. URL: http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN70429960 ; Unique identifier: ISRCTN70429960.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circheartfailure.119.006720

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tyl, B., Lopez Sendon, J., Borer, J. S., Lopez De Sa, E., Lerebours, G., Varin, C., De Montigny, A., Pannaux, M., & Komajda, M.
Affiliations
  • Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (France) (FR)
  • Cardiology Department (J.L.S.), University Hospital La Paz, UAM, IdiPaz, CiberCV, Madrid, Spain.
  • SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University (US)
  • Acute Cardiac Care Unit (E.L.D.S.), University Hospital La Paz, UAM, IdiPaz, CiberCV, Madrid, Spain.
  • Health Value 92, Levallois-Perret, France (G.L.).
  • Center of Excellence Methodology and Valorisation of Data (A.D.M., M.P.), Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
  • Department of Cardiology, Hospital Saint Joseph, Paris, France (M.K.).
Venue
Circulation: Heart Failure
Published
2020-07
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
e006720-e006720
ISSN
  • 1941-3289 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-3297
OpenAlex
W3037159462
Cited by
29
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Keywords
ivabradine, SHIFT trial, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, reduced ejection fraction, cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, case report forms
MeSH terms
Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Endpoint Determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review