The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progress and Current Status of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Three Device Generations of the CoreValve Revalving System
Abstract
Background— Percutaneous aortic valve replacement is a new emerging technology for interventional treatment of severe aortic valve stenosis in surgical high-risk patients. This study was intended to provide a summary of the development and current safety and efficacy status of the self-expanding CoreValve Revalving prosthesis. Method and Results— Between 2005 and 2008, we have enrolled 136 consecutive patients with percutaneous aortic valve replacement using the CoreValve prosthesis. In this prospective nonrandomized, single-center trial, we analyzed procedural outcome, complications and clinical status up to 1 year. First, second, and third generation of the CoreValve prosthesis were implanted in 10, 24, and 102 consecutive high-risk patients (logistic EuroScore: 23.1�15.0%) with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 41.5�16.7 mm Hg. The procedural success rate increased from generation 1/2 to 3 from 70.0%/70.8% to 91.2% ( P =0.003). The 30-day combined rate of death/stroke/myocardial infarction was 40.0%/20.8%/14.7% ( P =0.11) for generation 1, 2, and 3, with no procedural death in generation 3. Pressure gradients improved significantly with a final mean gradient of 8.1�3.8 mm Hg. Overall functional status assessed by New York Heart Association class improved from 3.3�0.5 (pre) to 1.7�0.7 (post) ( P <0.001) and remained stable in the follow-up. Conclusion— In experienced hands, percutaneous aortic valve replacement with the CoreValve system for selected patients with severe aortic valve stenosis has a high acute success rate associated with a low periprocedural mortality/stroke rate as well as remarkable clinical and hemodynamic improvements, which persist over time. Additional studies are now required to confirm these findings, particularly head-to-head comparisons with surgical valve replacement in different risk populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Iung, B. (2003) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/s0195-668x(03)00201-x · Cited by 3,530
Otto, C. M., Mickel, M. C., Kennedy, J. W., Alderman, E. L., Bashore, T. M., Block, P. C., Brinker, J. A., Diver, D., Ferguson, J., & Holmes, D. R. (1994) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.89.2.642 · Cited by 476
Cited by
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery
Leon, M. B., Smith, C. R., Mack, M., Miller, D. C., Moses, J. W., Svensson, L. G., Tuzcu, E. M., Webb, J. G., Fontana, G. P., Makkar, R. R., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1008232 · Cited by 7,205
Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients
Smith, C. R., Leon, M. B., Mack, M. J., Miller, D. C., Moses, J. W., Svensson, L. G., Tuzcu, E. M., Webb, J. G., Fontana, G. P., Makkar, R. R., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1103510 · Cited by 6,345
Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Clinical Trials
Leon, M. B., Piazza, N., Nikolsky, E., Blackstone, E. H., Cutlip, D. E., Kappetein, A. P., Krucoff, M. W., Mack, M., Mehran, R., Miller, C., et al. (2011) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.12.005 · Cited by 733
Abdel-Wahab, M., Mehilli, J., Frerker, C., Neumann, F.-J., Kurz, T., Tölg, R., Zachow, D., Guerra, E., Massberg, S., Schäfer, U., et al. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.3316 · Cited by 686
Eltchaninoff, H., Prat, A., Gilard, M., Leguerrier, A., Blanchard, D., Fournial, G., Iung, B., Donzeau-Gouge, P., Tribouilloy, C., Debrux, J.-L., et al. (2011) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehq261 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Grube, E., Buellesfeld, L., Mueller, R., Sauren, B., Zickmann, B., Nair, D., Beucher, H., Felderhoff, T., Iversen, S., & Gerckens, U.
- Venue
- Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 167-175
- ISSN
- 1941-7632 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7640
- OpenAlex
- W2055178919
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress and Current Status of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Three Device Generations of the CoreValve Revalving System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circinterventions.108.819839
- The paper
- Grube, E., Buellesfeld, L., Mueller, R., Sauren, B., Zickmann, B., Nair, D., Beucher, H., Felderhoff, T., Iversen, S., & Gerckens, U. (2008). Progress and Current Status of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Three Device Generations of the CoreValve Revalving System. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.108.819839
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
