Cited by 3Healthcare cost, quality, practicesHealthcare Quality and ManagementPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

How to do more with less

Sepehrvand, Nariman, Ezekowitz, Justin A.·2015·Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.115.002126

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The KCCQ has been shortened to consist of 12 questions to improve accessibility, and this shorter questionnaire has positive correlations with the original, high test-retest reliability and responsiveness.

    “The KCCQ has since been shortened to consist of 12 questions, to improve accessibility. 113 , 114 This shorter questionnaire has positive correlations with the original, high test–retest reliability and responsiveness. 113”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sepehrvand, N., & Ezekowitz, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2015-09
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
460-462
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2180793243
Cited by
3
References
21
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2016: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review