Cited by 444Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningElectronic Health Records Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blockchain Technology: Applications in Health Care

Angraal, Suveen, Krumholz, Harlan M., Schulz, Wade L.·2017·Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

B lockchain technology has gained substantial attention in recent years with increased interest in several diverse fields, including the healthcare industry.Blockchain offers a secure, distributed database that can operate without a central authority or administrator.Blockchain uses a distributed, peer-to-peer network to make a continuous, growing list of ordered records called blocks to form a digital ledger.Each transaction, represented in a cryptographically signed block, is then automatically validated by the network itself.Blockchain has also garnered interest as a platform to improve the authenticity and transparency of healthcare data through many use cases, from maintaining permissions in electronic health records (EHR) to streamlining claims processing.In this article, we describe the basics of blockchain and illustrate current and future applications of this technology within the healthcare industry. Healthcare Applications of BlockchainThis interest and momentum has now extended to healthcare information technology.Realizing the potential relevance and importance of blockchain in health care, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.117.003800

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 444

Metadata

Authors
Angraal, S., Krumholz, H. M., & Schulz, W. L.
Affiliations
Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
Venue
Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2017-09
Volume
10
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2754931682
Cited by
430
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
blockchain, health information technology, electronic health records, data security, data transparency, peer-to-peer networks, distributed ledger technology, claims management
MeSH terms
Administrative Claims, Healthcare, Confidentiality, Database Management Systems, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Insurance Claim Review, Computer Security, Biomedical Technology, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review