Cited by 67Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesHealth disparities and outcomes

Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic inequities in the prescription of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism in the United States.

Open access
Nathan, Ashwin S., Geng, Zhi, Dayoub, Elias J., Khatana, Sameed Ahmed M., Eberly, Lauren A., Kobayashi, Taisei, Pugliese, Steven C., Adusumalli, Srinath +2 more·2019·Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Beginning in 2012, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) were approved for treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. Prior investigations have demonstrated slow rates of adoption of novel therapeutics for black patients. We assessed the association of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic factors with DOAC use among commercially insured venous thromboembolism patients. Methods and Results: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients with an incident diagnosis of venous thromboembolism between January 2010 and December 2016 using OptumInsight’s Clinformatics Data Mart. We identified the first filled oral anticoagulant prescription within 30 days of discharge of an inpatient admission. We performed a multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, region, zip code–linked household income, and clinical covariates to identify factors associated with the use of DOACs. Race and ethnicity were determined in this database through a combination of public records, self-report, and proprietary ethnicity code tables. There were 14 140 patients included in the analysis. Treatment with DOACs increased from <0.1% in 2010 to 65.6% in 2016. In multivariable analyses, black patients were less likely to receive a DOAC compared with white patients (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77–0.97; P =0.02). There were no differences in DOAC utilization among Asian (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.75–1.49; P =0.74) or Hispanic patients (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.88–1.22; P =0.66) compared with whites. Patients with a household income over $100 000 per year were more likely to receive DOAC therapy compared with patients with a household income of <$40 000 per year (odds ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.33–1.69; P <0.0001). Conclusions: Although DOAC adoption has increased steadily since 2012, among a commercially insured population, black race and low household income were associated with lower use of DOACs for incident venous thromboembolism despite controlling for other clinical and socioeconomic factors. These findings suggest the possibility of both racial and socioeconomic inequity in access to this novel pharmacotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circoutcomes.119.005600

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [19]Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care; Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, editors. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2003. 25032386

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nathan, A. S., Geng, Z., Dayoub, E. J., Khatana, S. A. M., Eberly, L. A., Kobayashi, T., Pugliese, S. C., Adusumalli, S., Giri, J., & Groeneveld, P. W.
Affiliations
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics (US)
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Published
2019-04
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
e005600-e005600
ISSN
  • 1941-7705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7713
OpenAlex
W2933741778
Cited by
67
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL153772)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
direct oral anticoagulants, venous thromboembolism, racial disparities, ethnic disparities, socioeconomic disparities, Black patients, household income, commercially insured patients, health equity, post-discharge prescribing, Asian patients, Hispanic patients, Caucasian patients, United States
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Asian, Black or African American, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Time Factors, United States, Incidence, Databases, Factual, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, White People, Venous Thromboembolism, Healthcare Disparities, Social Determinants of Health, Factor Xa Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review