Cited by 150ECG Monitoring and AnalysisArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Detection of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction From Electrocardiographic Images

Open access
Sangha, Veer, Nargesi, Arash A., Dhingra, Lovedeep S., Khunte, Akshay, Mortazavi, Bobak J., Ribeiro, Antônio H., Banina, Evgeniya, Adeola, Oluwaseun +12 more·2023·Circulation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction is associated with a >8-fold increased risk of heart failure and a 2-fold risk of premature death. The use of ECG signals in screening for LV systolic dysfunction is limited by their availability to clinicians. We developed a novel deep learning–based approach that can use ECG images for the screening of LV systolic dysfunction. METHODS: Using 12-lead ECGs plotted in multiple different formats, and corresponding echocardiographic data recorded within 15 days from the Yale New Haven Hospital between 2015 and 2021, we developed a convolutional neural network algorithm to detect an LV ejection fraction <40%. The model was validated within clinical settings at Yale New Haven Hospital and externally on ECG images from Cedars Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles, CA; Lake Regional Hospital in Osage Beach, MO; Memorial Hermann Southeast Hospital in Houston, TX; and Methodist Cardiology Clinic of San Antonio, TX. In addition, it was validated in the prospective Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping was used to localize class-discriminating signals on ECG images. RESULTS: Overall, 385 601 ECGs with paired echocardiograms were used for model development. The model demonstrated high discrimination across various ECG image formats and calibrations in internal validation (area under receiving operation characteristics [AUROCs], 0.91; area under precision-recall curve [AUPRC], 0.55); and external sets of ECG images from Cedars Sinai (AUROC, 0.90 and AUPRC, 0.53), outpatient Yale New Haven Hospital clinics (AUROC, 0.94 and AUPRC, 0.77), Lake Regional Hospital (AUROC, 0.90 and AUPRC, 0.88), Memorial Hermann Southeast Hospital (AUROC, 0.91 and AUPRC 0.88), Methodist Cardiology Clinic (AUROC, 0.90 and AUPRC, 0.74), and Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health cohort (AUROC, 0.95 and AUPRC, 0.45). An ECG suggestive of LV systolic dysfunction portended >27-fold higher odds of LV systolic dysfunction on transthoracic echocardiogram (odds ratio, 27.5 [95% CI, 22.3–33.9] in the held-out set). Class-discriminative patterns localized to the anterior and anteroseptal leads (V 2 and V 3 ), corresponding to the left ventricle regardless of the ECG layout. A positive ECG screen in individuals with an LV ejection fraction ≥40% at the time of initial assessment was associated with a 3.9-fold increased risk of developing incident LV systolic dysfunction in the future (hazard ratio, 3.9 [95% CI, 3.3–4.7]; median follow-up, 3.2 years). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and externally validated a deep learning model that identifies LV systolic dysfunction from ECG images. This approach represents an automated and accessible screening strategy for LV systolic dysfunction, particularly in low-resource settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.122.062646

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A key challenge of AI-ECG models in detecting specific cardiac disorders using ECGs is low precision driven by the low prevalence of individual disorders.

    “A key challenge of AI-ECG models in detecting specific cardiac disorders using ECGs is the low precision driven by the low prevalence of individual disorders.10-12”

    From Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Structural Heart Disease Screening Using Electrocardiographic Images (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (page unavailable) report a positive predictive value of 0.26 for the AI-ECG model detecting left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The Discussion (page unavailable) notes lower disorder prevalence in a healthier validation cohort, but does not say that low prevalence drove low precision or establish this as a general challenge across individual cardiac disorders. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The low prevalence of individual structural heart diseases limits the potential implementation of models for broad screening because of the low PPVs of the proposed models.

    “While these models provide a strong foundation for the role of ECG-based detection of SHDs, the low prevalence of these individual diseases, their potential implementation for broad screening is limited by the low PPVs of the proposed models.10-12,16,32-34”

    From Ensemble Deep Learning Algorithm for Structural Heart Disease Screening Using Electrocardiographic Images (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (Detection of LV Systolic Dysfunction; page unavailable) report a PPV of 0.26. The Discussion (page unavailable) notes lower disease prevalence in a healthier validation cohort and says screening thresholds may need recalibration. The paper does not conclude that low prevalence and PPV limit broad screening implementation; it calls for prospective assessment in that setting. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previously, applications of artificial intelligence for electrocardiograms have shown potential to detect signatures of structural heart diseases.

    “Previously applications of artificial intelligence for electrocardiograms (AI-ECG) have shown potential to detect signatures of SHDs.10-18”
  • Prior studies have reported the use of deep learning on 12-lead ECGs to detect individual structural cardiovascular conditions, including LVSD, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, and aortic stenosis.

    “Prior studies have reported the use of deep learning on 12-lead ECGs to detect individual structural cardiovascular conditions, including LVSD,10,11,13 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy,16,32,33 cardiac amyloidosis,34,35 aortic stenosis,12 among others.15,35-37”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sangha, V., Nargesi, A. A., Dhingra, L. S., Khunte, A., Mortazavi, B. J., Ribeiro, A. H., Banina, E., Adeola, O., Garg, N., Brandt, C. A., Miller, E. J., Ribeiro, A. L. P., Velazquez, E. J., Giatti, L., Barreto, S. M., Foppa, M., Yuan, N., Ouyang, D., Krumholz, H. M., & Khera, R.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Yale New Haven Hospital (US)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • Lake Regional Hospital (US)
  • Methodist Healthcare (US)
  • Memorial Hermann (US)
  • Telehealth Center and Cardiology Service, Hospital das Clínicas (A.L.P.R.), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
  • Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Khera, Rohan
Venue
Circulation
Published
2023-08-29
Volume
148
Issue
9
Pages
765-777
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W4385230416
Cited by
150
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 12
FWCI
29.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Yale University
  • Shenzhen Center for Health Information
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL153775)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
left ventricular systolic dysfunction, ECG images, 12-lead ECG, deep learning, convolutional neural networks, left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure screening, automated screening, Grad-CAM, resource-limited settings
MeSH terms
Adult, Electrocardiography, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Ventricular Function, Left, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review