Cited by 105

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Semaphorin Induce Neuropilin-1 Endocytosis via Separate Pathways

Salikhova, Anna, Wang, Ling, Lanahan, Anthony A., Liu, Miaoliang, Simons, Michael, Leenders, William P. J., Mukhopadhyay, Debabrata, Horowitz, Arie·2008·Circulation Research

Abstract

The neuropilin (Nrp)1 receptor is essential for both nervous and vascular system development. Nrp1 is unusually versatile, because it transmits both chemoattractive and repulsive signals in response to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and class 3 semaphorins, respectively. Both Nrp1 and VEGF receptor 2 undergo ligand-dependent endocytosis. We sought to establish the endocytic pathway of Nrp1 and to determine whether uptake is required for its signaling. Whereas Nrp1 underwent clathrin-dependent endocytosis in response to VEGFA 165 treatment, semaphorin 3C (sema3C) induced lipid raft–dependent endocytosis. The myosin VI PDZ (postsynaptic density 95, Disk large, Zona occludens-1) adaptor protein synectin was essential for Nrp1 trafficking. Sema3C failed to inhibit migration of synectin −/− endothelial cells, mirroring the lower migratory response of these cells to VEGFA 165 . These results show that the endocytic pathway of Nrp1 is determined by its ligand and that the trafficking of Nrp1 is essential for its signaling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circresaha.108.183327

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several DEGs previously associated with lipid metabolism were identified, including MIAT, COMT, NRP1, VEGFB, GRAMD1B, DSEL, and FUT9 associated with glycan structure.

    “We identified several DEGs that have been previously associated with lipid metabolism, including MIAT, COMT, NRP1, VEGFB, GRAMD1B, DSEL56–62, as well as FUT9 associated with glycan structure63,64 (Fig. 4a).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00462.x · DOI
  2. 10.1083/jcb.200602080 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202478 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.06.004 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.mcn.2004.01.010 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nn1380 · DOI
  7. 10.1182/blood-2005-10-4113 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00157-6 · DOI
  9. 10.1182/blood-2007-06-096529 · DOI
  10. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-15-06519.1999 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12340 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.0605317103 · DOI
  13. 10.1096/fj.05-5504fje · DOI
  14. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4366 · DOI
  15. 10.1242/jcs.114.2.353 · DOI
  16. 10.1242/jcs.112.9.1303 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80370-0 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.03.012 · DOI
  19. 10.1242/jcs.103.3.857 · DOI
  20. 10.1091/mbc.e06-01-0002 · DOI
  21. 10.1242/dev.128.16.3061 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.06.002 · DOI
  23. 10.1091/mbc.e02-07-0379 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.018 · DOI
  25. 10.1096/fj.05-3889fje · DOI
  26. 10.1074/jbc.M703554200 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/356722a0 · DOI
  28. 10.1074/jbc.270.11.6320 · DOI
  29. 10.1242/jcs.01190 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00188-X · DOI
  31. 10.1083/jcb.200404106 · DOI
  32. 10.4049/jimmunol.170.2.913 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601456 · DOI
  34. 10.1126/science.1068886 · DOI
  35. 10.1074/jbc.M004599200 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/emboj/16.18.5501 · DOI
  37. 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00128.x · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.003 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nature05996 · DOI
  40. 10.1124/jpet.105.099507 · DOI
  41. 10.1161/01.res.0000158286.51045.16 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Salikhova, A., Wang, L., Lanahan, A. A., Liu, M., Simons, M., Leenders, W. P. J., Mukhopadhyay, D., & Horowitz, A.
Affiliations
From the Angiogenesis Research Center (A.S., A.A.L., M.L., M.S., A.H.), Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (L.W., D.M.), Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Rochester, Minn; and Department of Pathology (W.P.J.L.), Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2008-09-12
Volume
103
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0009-7330
  • 1524-4571
Cited by
105
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review