Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Smooth Muscle Cell Plasticity: Fact or Fiction?

Open access
Nguyen, Anh T., Gomez, Delphine, Bell, Robert D., Campbell, Julie H., Clowes, Alexander W., Gabbiani, Giulio, Giachelli, Cecilia M., Parmacek, Michael S., Raines, Elaine W., Rusch, Nancy J., Speer, Mei Y., Sturek, Michael, Thyberg, Johan, Towler, Dwight A., Weiser-Evans, Mary C., Yan, Chen, Miano, Joseph M., Owens, Gary K.·2013·Circulation Research

Abstract

More than 50 years ago, smooth muscle cells (SMC) of the carotid artery were shown to undergo "de-differentiation" upon ligation injury. 1 Since this classic study, scores of research groups have used a variety of in vivo and in vitro model systems as well as numerous clinical studies to demonstrate the conversion of normally contractile vascular SMC to a less differentiated state of proliferation, migration, and exuberant extracellular matrix secretion, a process generally referred to as phenotypic modulation or plasticity [reviewed in 2-6]. Such changes in vascular SMC phenotype are thought to underlie many vascular occlusive diseases. However, in a recent issue of Nature Communications , Tang et al 7 provide data from in vitro cell culture, flow cytometry, and lineage tracing experiments which they believe directly challenge this long-standing and widely accepted paradigm. Specifically, these authors contend that: (1) differentiated (SM myosin heavy chain, SM MHC+) vascular SMC are incapable of proliferation either in vivo in response to injury or in vitro in cell culture; (2) within the media of mature blood vessels there exists a small population (

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circresaha.112.281048

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Nguyen, A. T., Gomez, D., Bell, R. D., Campbell, J. H., Clowes, A. W., Gabbiani, G., Giachelli, C. M., Parmacek, M. S., Raines, E. W., Rusch, N. J., Speer, M. Y., Sturek, M., Thyberg, J., Towler, D. A., Weiser-Evans, M. C., Yan, C., Miano, J. M., & Owens, G. K.
Venue
Circulation Research
Published
2013-01-04
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
17-22
ISSN
  • 0009-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4571
OpenAlex
W2129555959
Cited by
162
References
2
FWCI
9.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smooth Muscle Cell Plasticity: Fact or Fiction? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/circresaha.112.281048
The paper
Nguyen, A. T., Gomez, D., Bell, R. D., Campbell, J. H., Clowes, A. W., Gabbiani, G., Giachelli, C. M., Parmacek, M. S., Raines, E. W., Rusch, N. J., Speer, M. Y., Sturek, M., Thyberg, J., Towler, D. A., Weiser-Evans, M. C., Yan, C., Miano, J. M., & Owens, G. K. (2013). Smooth Muscle Cell Plasticity: Fact or Fiction? Circulation Research. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.112.281048

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.